3

I just came across a user posting a fairly bad, sarcastic answer to a 5 day old question with a number of answers (9 including his).

Here is a screenshot of the answer and the ensuing comment thread. That was after I edited out some chit chat about dinosaurs.

enter image description here

I am concerned that I didn't respond appropriately. I have copied out the comments:

This isn't what the user wanted. Make it a real answer, or delete it please. – Tim

You should see the question again and tell me if he specifically asked for bash programming... And why did you downvote me? – urosjarc

That's not my issue. I posted an answer in python too. My issue is a) the extra output you gave and b) not outputting for every case. (where are the A and B outputs)? – Tim

Jesus @Tim, I think someone is smart enough to figure it out how to continue program by its own, or modify it. He is not a child... – urosjarc

He might be, but this is not a forum. Complete answers here please, and get rid of the snarky comments. If you do, I'll undo the downvote. If you don't, I'll flag for deletion. – Tim

Tim I kinda don't care do what u please. – urosjarc

Then this isn't the place for you. At Ask Ubuntu we appreciate positive answers that help the asker. We don't appreciate users who post joke answers which make more work for someone. I've flagged, and I'm opening a meta post because I'm not sure I responded appropriately here. – Tim

Pls see all the answers on this question and you will see that my answer is so easy that anyone could understand, and my intentions was not to make exact copy of solution, the solution is viewed by asker who can modify to its own tail. What if user after a while wants different behaviour. I'm pretty sure that he will not want to use your script to to this... he will use the simplest one... and don't have so big ego... pls see what is the best for the asker. – urosjarc

I don't expect him to use mine. I expect him to use the accepted one. However, if you haven't noticed, mine works, outputs for every case without childish, barely hidden sexual innuendo and unnecessary comments. I'm not sure why you are so against simply editing your answer. You would actually help someone, follow the rules of the site and not be wasting our time. I've flagged, as I said, and here is the meta post: meta.askubuntu.com/questions/13989 – Tim

So. Did I do the right thing, or was I too harsh? Here is the source of the answer (a pastebin). Note line 10, and the lack of if statements for the A and B cases.

  • 1
    A -1 and a delete from me. That said, if you did edit it, why didn't you just replace the outputs with straightforward A, D, etc.? O.o I would have taken a hatchet to the thing. – muru May 15 '15 at 4:44
  • 2
    @muru Considering the OP's own code covers only the F, D, and C cases, I don't think the absence of A and B in an answer is a problem. Furthermore, while I don't think the text printed alongside the grade letters is funny, it seems pretty unreasonable to me to demand that code given in answers print exactly the text requested. My answers don't print all the same text as in the OP's code either (prompt and error message are different). I wouldn't object to a demonstrable improvement to my code, but I wouldn't want it edited to print the same as in the question. – Eliah Kagan May 15 '15 at 6:43
  • @EliahKagan I wasn't talking of missing output, but of editing what's actually output. E.g, I'd have changed "She wants the D" to "D", and so on. Why change "She wants the D" to "She wants it" and not "D", if you're going to change it at all? I don't really care what the other answers do, or whether it is a complete answer. I'm just talking about the edit. – muru May 15 '15 at 7:04
  • 1
    Revision 3 in the edit history, which changed "She like wants the D." to "She wants it...", was done by the answer's author, not by Tim. Considering that there's actually zero indication that the author really disrespects site policy or the will of the community (see my answer here), I suspect they may have been deliberately trying to tone it down... though of course I don't really know. Unfortunately, now that the answer has been prematurely deleted, non-10k users can't even view its revision history to form their own opinions. – Eliah Kagan May 15 '15 at 7:18
  • 1
    @EliahKagan what's to form in an opinion? The answer is sexist, the op''s edit didn't make it any less sexist and deserved to be deleted. Now that I think of it, I should have flagged it as offensive instead of voting for deletion. – muru May 15 '15 at 7:21
  • 1
    @muru Why didn't you flag it as offensive? Was it because you anticipated your view on whether or not immediate action had to be taken on the post might not be shared by other members of this community? Was the content you considered objectionable so essential to the post that you'd consider an edit inappropriate? Do you think there's no room for difference of opinion on that, either? Unlike some posts, in this one the author really tried to make a useful answer--and succeeded. I'm very concerned about the precedent we're setting here, valuing quick resolution over community consensus. – Eliah Kagan May 15 '15 at 7:35
  • 2
    @EliahKagan it was already at -3 when I saw it, with the delete option enabled. I saw the delete option, and took it, without further thought. I don't have the time to waste editing a sexist idiot's answers into political correctness. Deleting, on the other hand, takes little to no time. I have no concerns over the precedent being set here: if you're sexist, you're not welcome. Period. I don't care if the answer is the most brilliant one in the history of stack exchange, the op was warned and chose to ignore it. – muru May 15 '15 at 7:44
  • @EliahKagan and that's what my first comment was about: if Tim took the time to edit it, why didn't he fix the sexism while he was at it? O.o – muru May 15 '15 at 7:49
  • 1
    @muru As detailed in my answer, the "warning" the OP received was both abusive and severely inadequate as an explanation of site policy. Furthermore, if sexism is really the issue here, then it had another problem: it did not mention sexism in the slightest. I see how the particular sexual innuendo in the post may be considered sexist, but nobody said anything about that to the post author; Tim's objection related instead to professionalism. Actually opposing sexism entails actually objecting to it in some way, not merely rendering it invisible under the guise of less controversial reasons. – Eliah Kagan May 15 '15 at 7:54
  • @EliahKagan sure, then vote to undelete it and if it gets undeleted, I'll voice my objections as clearly as you want. Then proceed to flag as offensive and then, if given the option again, vote to delete, again. – muru May 15 '15 at 7:58
  • @EliahKagan and, in case you haven't understood it yet, sexism is the only issue I'm talking of in my comments, in relation to Tim's behaviour - why he chose to leave that part there - my mistake in confusing OP's edit with Tim's edit, but the original question was about that. – muru May 15 '15 at 8:02
  • @EliahKagan and let me remind you that I'm not a mod here. I can't singlehandedly delete an answer, so if the the answer was deleted by someone other than the OP or a mod, then two other members of the community agreed with me. – muru May 15 '15 at 8:05
  • @muru I can't undelete-vote; it's mod-deleted. You first mentioned sexism very, very recently. You didn't comment on the post, didn't flag it offensive, and your first comments here didn't mention the issue. If I hadn't commented, would you ever have brought it up? If you say sexism was always your objection to the post, I have no choice but to believe you. But I hope you see how prohibiting sexism didn't (and still doesn't) seem to me like the precedent being set here. – Eliah Kagan May 15 '15 at 8:24
  • @EliahKagan Aw, c'mon, did I actually have to say the word "sexism" for you to get that? It seemed pretty obvious to me. And, no, I may not the have brought up the word specifically, but that depends on how the conversation would have developed. Whether or not you believe me is not my concern. – muru May 15 '15 at 8:32
7

You should feel free to downvote any post you really think is useless. Furthermore, it was probably good you informed the answer's author that you were unsure if you responded appropriately and that you were posting on meta. This might have helped to clarify the possibility that your words did not reflect site policy.

Besides that, though, in my opinion, you did not respond appropriately. The problem is not one of being too harsh--instead, I believe you have somewhat misunderstood both (a) site policy and (b) the answer you were critiquing.

First, it is rarely good to tell someone to leave our community. I understand you were trying to avoid rudeness--you said "Then this isn't the place for you."--but in this context you were in effect telling somebody that they must either do what you say or get out.

I think it's usually best to let people decide for themselves if they are a good fit for the Ubuntu community. For example, if someone said, "How dare you improve the grammar of my question?" it would make sense to tell them that such edits are considered appropriate on Ask Ubuntu, and that if it is important to them that people not do that, then our site might not be the best place for them to seek support.

I suspect there are exceptions to this guideline, but I can't think of any in a confrontational context.

You might be concerned that sometimes, for the good of the community, someone needs to be given an ultimatum and told "Do it this way, or get out!" But that doesn't mean you need to tell them. I think that's the sort of exceptional situation where a moderator should do the talking. They are elected for that purpose (among others). It will be clear, when they say it, that it really represents the official word on the subject.

Second, when I read your comments I got the distinct feeling that you were invoking communal authority inappropriately. Throughout your comments you talked about the community and said we and our a lot. I can't speak for anyone else, but as I read them I know I certainly didn't feel included in any of that. You blamed an argument between two individuals--the post author, and you--on the post author's unwillingness to cooperate. At no point did you show the post author--with links, or in any other way--that they were actually failing to cooperate with real community norms.

This would have been bad enough if you were correct, but I don't think you were. Not only is the post an acceptable answer, but I have no idea where you would find sources for most of the things you said about site policy (see below for details). And while I'm sure this was unintentional, the phrase "before a mod gets involved" seems to convey the idea that moderator involvement in a dispute is some sort of traumatic event.

Third, the post is not a joke answer, and I don't think it's sarcastic either, though I'm not really sure what you mean by that in this context. It presents a solution that must arguably be modified--albeit in a trivial way--to meet the OP's precise needs. I say "arguably" since the question does not actually contain a specification of which letter grades should be included. The closest thing to such a specification is the code the OP provided us. And that code only covers cases F, D, and C! The rest of us assumed the OP wanted to cover the common grades B and A, and answered accordingly; this answer is the only one really faithful to that aspect of the question.

Incidentally, both your answers sometimes return "E" as a grade. I don't think that's common in an academic grading system--I've never heard of anybody scoring an "E." (I admit I am mostly familiar only with grading systems in the United States and Canada, however.) Although I do consider this a significant weakness of your answers, I don't think it makes them "joke answers which make more work for someone" either.

Furthermore, the answer presents the solution clearly. It illustrates how to solve the problem in Python, in a compact and readable way. The author is correct to believe the OP can easily extend it to provide additional letter grades or to remove the messages accompanying the grade letters.

Fourth, the author did not actually express an unwillingness to comply with community rules. Although you talked about the community a lot, the post author didn't. When you said you would flag the post for deletion, they said they did not care. I believe context makes clear they were saying they did not care whether or not you personally flagged the post. It was your actions they professed not to care about. You then said: "Then this isn't the place for you."

That doesn't seem right.

Fifth, you explicitly presented the problem as being about the author's unwillingness to listen to you:

The issue is the sexual innuendo which is inappropriate for a professional site, the lack of A and B cases and your unresponsiveness to listening to an experienced user.

On average experienced users may be more likely than inexperienced users to understand how people should conduct themselves on the site; we get additional site privileges in recognition of this. But we do not have personal authority to tell people how to behave, more than any user has who is able to post comments.

Even if we are right to think someone is doing the wrong thing, the reason it's wrong is not because we think it is, nor because we say it is. This site doesn't have a social hierarchy where users with more rep, badges, or years of participation get the authority to issue orders which must be obeyed.

And experienced users can be wrong.

Sixth, we do not have a policy that answers to scripting questions must spoon-feed the OP with complete code solutions. (If you believe we actually have such a policy, please comment or edit your question with clarification. But I'm pretty sure we don't.)

A good answer is one that answers the question--it tells the OP what they want to know, or helps them understand what they are looking to understand. One way to answer a scripting question is to provide a complete, working script. But usually people want to comprehend how to do something. An explanation that makes clear how to do something is an acceptable answer, and often a good answer, irrespective of whether or not its code examples constitute complete solutions to the problem as it has specifically been stated.

Ask Ubuntu is not a code golf site. Answerers are not being evaluated for their skills in turning out complete programs that produce precisely the specified output. An answer that demonstrates to readers how to solve the problem is just as good. Answering questions here is not, for most people, a job, and the goal is not always to conform the OP's specific demands. Finally, answers aren't just (or even primarily) for the OP.

In this case, it looks like the OP is trying to understand how to solve a particular kind of task by writing a script. This answer is fully compliant with that aim.

Seventh, the original version of the answer did not contain "chit chat about dinosaurs." Using the word "dinosaur" to mean something old, decrepit, and unwieldy is a common English idiom. This meaning is common enough to be listed in multiple respected dictionaries.

3 : one that is impractically large, out-of-date, or obsolete

2 A person or thing that is outdated or has become obsolete because of failure to adapt to changing circumstances.

In the original version of the answer, the author is explaining why they recommend using Python. (Explanations of why one recommends something are, in my experience, usually considered good on Ask Ubuntu.) You removed over half that explanation and altered the rest. Here's the original lead paragraph:

The python is default installed on every linux os so why programming in bash (its old dinosaurs). Google does it in python, every one doing in python for linux... You should do it too!

Here's the version after your edit:

The python is installed by default on every Ubuntu so why program in bash?

If I'd seen an edit like that from a low-rep user in review, I would've either rejected it as a radical change or clicked Reject and Edit to make the lead look something like this:

Python is in Ubuntu's default installation, and comes with every other Linux-based OS too. There's no longer any reason to do this in Bash, which is an old dinosaur among scripting languages. Google uses Python, everyone these days is scripting in Python on Linux--you should try it too!

I believe that both captures and somewhat clarifies the original intent.

It's true that the author's original words did not constitute a fully adept use of the "dinosaur" idiom (the author wrote "its old dinosaurs"). If someone wrote a post in standard English with no errors except the phrase "its old dinosaurs," then there might be question about their meaning. But judging from the way the post is written, and also from the author's profile, it seems likely English is not the author's first language. Considering that, and how commonly this meaning of "dinosaur" is used, I don't think there's any ambiguity here.

Eighth, you often stated what you believed to be site policy in an ambiguous way.

The author said:

I think someone is smart enough to figure it out how to continue programm by its own, or modify it.

You replied:

He might be, but this is not a forum. Complete answers here please, and get rid of the snarky comments. If you do, I'll undo the downvote. If you don't, I'll flag for deletion

As detailed above, this was a complete answer. But besides that, what is the significance in this case of Ask Ubuntu not being a forum? If you think the post is unprofessional, sarcastic, a joke, and only creates more work for people without helping them, why would you want the author to put it on a forum?

You also said:

At Ask Ubuntu we appreciate potivve answers that help the asker.

I've been using the site for a while, but I have no idea what you mean by a "positive answer."

Ninth, your concern about the post's sexual innuendo might be merited, but this is a borderline case that should be decided by the community.

I understand that my own views of what content should be considered objectionable sometimes differ from those of the Ask Ubuntu community. But the innuendo here seems pretty tame, and the author has even edited some of it. I think the edit might be intended to tone it down, but I admit I'm not really sure.

I do think the humor in the script's output is pretty weak, though. I don't find it funny at all, and I suspect not many other people will either, though I cannot say that with any certainty. While the current "snarky comments" in the code (as you put it) don't offend me, personally I hope the author will change them out for other snarky comments of higher quality.

Reading programming books printed by respectable publishers, I've seen mild sexual innuendo, as well as jokes about suicide in the form of "Goodbye, cruel world!" programs. Jokes about car crashes are common also. Two separate book series, both including many volumes on computer topics, insult their readers in every title. The cofounder of a major, respected network of question-answer sites--contributed to and relied upon daily by many professionals in computer-related fields--once joked in a tweet about murdering people who reported pluralization bugs.

I don't mention any of these things to judge them well or ill. Just because something happens in a professional community doesn't mean we should consider it appropriate for a professional community. But I think this shows it's unreliable to extrapolate hastily from one's own opinion to the opinion of the community as a whole.

4

I have now edited the answer to i) fix the issue with grades falling on the bin boundaries and ii) remove the inappropriate output. I don't understand why this was not simply done in the first place. I agree with everything that Eliah said in his answer, and I really don't understand why 4 people downvoted instead of just editing or, at least, also editing.

The whole point of this site allowing edits is to fix precisely this type of issue. The person who answered gave a valid solution that addressed everything the OP asked for. I quite agree that the "humor" was, at best, childish and, at worst, offensive, but that is easily fixed with an edit. Instead, you chose to give the OP a lecture on etiquette. While guiding new members is to be encouraged, ideally, this should always be done with references to back up your claims. Links to previous meta discussions or help center articles, for example.

There is no rule that humor is not allowed on the SE network. It should never take precedence over the actual answer and it shouldn't be as asinine and sexist as the "She wants it..." comment, but there's no rule that says that levity is off topic. Not that I know of anyway.

In any case, next time, instead of leaving comments demanding that the OP do one thing or the other, you should i) suggest/ask the OP to do something and ii) edit the post yourself to fix whatever issues you've seen. You have more than enough rep to do that. Instead, you chose to edit to remove a relatively innocuous aside about bash and left the things you were objecting to! Since you took the trouble to edit, why not fix the post and be done with it?

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .