Timeline for Mention multiple users
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:25 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://askubuntu.com/ with https://askubuntu.com/
|
|
| May 7, 2015 at 18:15 | comment | added | Thomas Ward Mod | @minerz029 to the end user, probably not, but you sacrifice some backend stuff, and unless coded right you could 'leak' the data to the clients. But it would be against the current idea of how highlights work. | |
| Apr 30, 2015 at 10:30 | comment | added | kiri | Voting is meant to be a private action. Would adding '@down-voters' (etc.) compromise this? | |
| Apr 29, 2015 at 13:29 | history | edited | Eliah Kagan |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 28, 2015 at 17:00 | comment | added | Dan | I'd just like to mention that similar stuff have been suggested several times to SE, but they always used to get declined. example but all of the ones I know of are quite a few years old. Maybe SE might reconsider now. | |
| Apr 26, 2015 at 10:35 | history | edited | Rmano | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Apr 26, 2015 at 10:29 | history | edited | Rmano | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added some more thinking on the feature, thanks to @ThomasW. 's comment.
|
| Apr 26, 2015 at 10:28 | comment | added | Rmano | @ThomasW. I see. Obviously it should be restricted at, say, 2k reputation or something like that. Will update the question. | |
| Apr 26, 2015 at 3:01 | comment | added | Thomas Ward Mod | @Rmano you pretty much just did, however I think a concerning issue here is that it could be used as a spam / disruptivity vector to attack down voters, close voters, etc. You also have to consider down voters and upvoters in two contexts: answers, and questions. I think implementation-wise there's holes in the request. | |
| Apr 21, 2015 at 6:04 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/AskUbuntu/status/590395728285007872 | ||
| Apr 16, 2015 at 5:27 | comment | added | Rmano | What is the procedure to submit a new feature proposal? | |
| Apr 16, 2015 at 3:27 | comment | added | Panther | I like the idea of @ down-voters or @ close-voters . Note - you will still be relying on those users to respond or comment, but getting notice of an update or edit would be nice. | |
| Apr 15, 2015 at 9:00 | comment | added | Fabby | I think it's a really good idea that might make our life easier. The work-around now is: Mark as a favourite question, revisit when closed. edit and leave a big bold comment why this is not a duplicate, vote to re-open. (re-open votes are quicker to accrue then close votes) If you want, I can cast the last close vote and then we can start the process of re-opening... | |
| Apr 15, 2015 at 8:36 | comment | added | RobotHumans | It would be an interesting feature, but I can tell you if I'm voting to close something I read all the comments - and you can ping me in chat and quote the comment. | |
| Apr 15, 2015 at 8:20 | history | asked | Rmano | CC BY-SA 3.0 |