Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with flagging
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 5768
5
votes
Accepted
2
votes
Should an answer like remove Ubuntu and install (insert distro here) be flagged / downvoted?
Every time I see one of those, I'm tempted to answer:
"Boot live and enter the following: sudo dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/sda"
Then start over how ever you like.
- 29.9k
12
votes
Accepted
When are "you can do this different thing instead" answers considered good?
I tend to think of the answer as appropriate if:
It's evident that the user is after a specific way of doing something, but the goal can be accomplished in another way
It's appears that the ques …
- 29.9k
5
votes
Can we give rep to those who flag questions?
Flagging should not be as gamified as voting. If voting requires thought, flagging is serious.
You shouldn't submit marginal flags. …
- 29.9k
2
votes
What should I (or we) do about answers that obviously miss the point of the question entirely?
I agree with the flag on that one. It's almost like someone (or something) saw "adobe" as a keyword and posted a flash answer to a pdf question.
- 29.9k
3
votes
Accepted
Should really good/detailed "me too" answers have their content merged into the question?
I would put a comment asking the OP if the me too bit applies or be absolutely sure it doesn't change the meaning of the question.
Then I'ld just edit it in.
Edits can be reverted if it turns ou …
- 29.9k
4
votes
Can only flag as "very low quality" if is not in the positive for votes
My opinion, if you REALLY wanted to flag that as low quality, you could just use a custom reason and put "Link only answer".
I'd drop a comment first though, saying something like "Link only answers …
- 29.9k