I'm on a bit of an "edit rampage" on AskUbuntu.
According to https://askubuntu.com/review/suggested-edits/1183929 ...
Two users rejected my edit and cited:
The edit does not improve the quality of the post. Changes to the content are unnecessary or make the post more confusing.
My comment with my suggested edit was:
Improved English, removed irrelevant text, added some formatting
My opinion (of course) is that my ~15 changes to the question text absolutely did improve the readability and clarity of the post. I take the editing of other users' content very seriously and I aim to only do non-trivial and comprehensive edits.
May I receive more specific feedback about why my suggested edit was rejected? How bad could my suggested edit have been to not merit the "Improve Edit" option? Were these bad reviews?