I have a moral problem with the votes and bounty reward on the following question: One single cron job not running in which user Елин Й.has posted an answer that in my believe is:
- unhelpful (because the asker stated in a comment that (s)he has added
sudoto see if it did make any difference)
- a low quality answer (because it does not make any effort to solve the original question)
- not even an decent answer because it is not much more than an oneliner.
The asker hasn't accepted any answer yet so I believe the reward of half of the bounty is wrong here and I don't understand why a low quality answer gets upvotes at all.
(And Yes: I do understand how the bounty gets rewarded, and No: I don't think my own answer is better).
I feel something has to be done against users that are apparently only after getting reputation points instead of helping others out and this one is not the only example. I can find several others.