Return to Answer

I have a moral problem with the votes and bounty reward on the following question

Speaking of the votes: those are fair.

Why?

Because important details should be edited into the question and not added as a comment.

Answerers and voters shouldn't really have to look into the comments section before voting, and the question as it stood highly suggested sudo being the problem (I falled for that myself: see my comments under the question).

So technically that would be OP's fault, but you can't really blame it on them too much IMO since they're a user only since 14 days.

Speaking of the bounty; this:

Bounty Started worth 50 reputation by GreenGodot

And this:

Bounty Ended with Елин Й.'s answer chosen by Community♦

Mean that OP started a bounty to draw attention to their question and that this happened:

If you do not award the bounty within 24 hours of the bounty period ending, half the bounty value will be automatically awarded to the top voted answer posted after the bounty start, provided it has a score of at least 2.

Fair? Obviously not always, but the problem is that likewise obviously a bot can't deem answers valid itself. Deeming answers valid is up to the voters, and the bot acts in behalf of them.

So, summing up, you can't really blame it on anyone.

OP can't be blamed too much, the answerer can't be blamed, the voters can't be blamed and the Community♦ user can't be blamed.

I have a moral problem with the votes and bounty reward on the following question

Speaking of the votes: those are fair.

Why?

Because important details should be edited into the question and not added as a comment.

Answerers and voters shouldn't really have to look into the comments section before voting, and the question as it stood highly suggested sudo being the problem (I falled for that myself: see my comments under the question).

So technically that would be OP's fault, but you can't really blame it on them too much IMO since they're a user only since 14 days.

Speaking of the bounty; this:

Bounty Started worth 50 reputation by GreenGodot

And this:

Bounty Ended with Елин Й.'s answer chosen by Community♦

Mean that OP started a bounty to draw attention to their question and that this happened:

If you do not award the bounty within 24 hours of the bounty period ending, half the bounty value will be automatically awarded to the top voted answer posted after the bounty start, provided it has a score of at least 2.

Fair? Obviously not always, but the problem is that likewise obviously a bot can't deem answers valid itself. Deeming answers valid is up to the voters, and the bot acts in behalf of them.

So, summing up, you can't really blame it on anyone.

OP can't be blamed too much, the answerer can't be blamed, the voters can't be blamed and the Community♦ user can't be blamed.

I have a moral problem with the votes and bounty reward on the following question

Speaking of the votes: those are fair.

Why?

Because important details should be edited into the question and not added as a comment.

Answerers and voters shouldn't really have to look into the comments section before voting, and the question as it stood highly suggested sudo being the problem (I falled for that myself: see my comments under the question).

So technically that would be OP's fault, but you can't really blame it on him too much IMO since they're a user only since 14 days.

Speaking of the bounty; this:

Bounty Started worth 50 reputation by GreenGodot

And this:

Bounty Ended with Елин Й.'s answer chosen by Community♦

Mean that OP started a bounty to draw attention to their question and that this happened:

If you do not award the bounty within 24 hours of the bounty period ending, half the bounty value will be automatically awarded to the top voted answer posted after the bounty start, provided it has a score of at least 2.

Fair? Obviously not always, but the problem is that likewise obviously a bot can't deem answers valid itself. Deeming answers valid is up to the voters, and the bot acts in behalf of them.

So, summing up, you can't really blame it on anyone.

OP can't be blamed too much, the answerer can't be blamed, the voters can't be blamed and the Community♦ user can't be blamed.

I have a moral problem with the votes and bounty reward on the following question

Speaking of the votes: those are fair.

Why?

Because important details should be edited into the question and not added as a comment.

Answerers and voters shouldn't really have to look into the comments section before voting, and the question as it stood highly suggested sudo being the problem (I falled for that myself: see my comments under the question).

So technically that would be OP's fault, but you can't really blame it on them too much IMO since they're a user only since 14 days.

Speaking of the bounty; this:

Bounty Started worth 50 reputation by GreenGodot

And this:

Bounty Ended with Елин Й.'s answer chosen by Community♦

Mean that OP started a bounty to draw attention to their question and that this happened:

If you do not award the bounty within 24 hours of the bounty period ending, half the bounty value will be automatically awarded to the top voted answer posted after the bounty start, provided it has a score of at least 2.

Fair? Obviously not always, but the problem is that likewise obviously a bot can't deem answers valid itself. Deeming answers valid is up to the voters, and the bot acts in behalf of them.

So, summing up, you can't really blame it on anyone.

OP can't be blamed too much, the answerer can't be blamed, the voters can't be blamed and the Community♦ user can't be blamed.

I have a moral problem with the votes and bounty reward on the following question

Speaking of the votes: those are fair.

Why?

Because important details should be edited into the question and not added as a comment.

Answerers and voters shouldn't really have to look into the comments section before voting, and the question as it stood highly suggested sudo being the problem (I falled for that myself: see my comments under the question).

So technically that would be OP's fault, but you can't really blame it on him IMO since they're a user only since 14 days.

Speaking of the bounty; this:

Bounty Started worth 50 reputation by GreenGodot

And this:

Bounty Ended with Елин Й.'s answer chosen by Community♦

Mean that OP started a bounty to draw attention to their question and that this happened:

If you do not award the bounty within 24 hours of the bounty period ending, half the bounty value will be automatically awarded to the top voted answer posted after the bounty start, provided it has a score of at least 2.

Fair? Obviously not always, but the problem is that likewise obviously a bot can't deem answers valid itself. Deeming answers valid is up to the voters, and the bot acts in behalf of them.

So, summing up, you can't really blame it on anyone.

OP can't be blamed, the answerer can't be blamed, the voters can't be blamed and the Community♦ user can't be blamed.

I have a moral problem with the votes and bounty reward on the following question

Speaking of the votes: those are fair.

Why?

Because important details should be edited into the question and not added as a comment.

Answerers and voters shouldn't really have to look into the comments section before voting, and the question as it stood highly suggested sudo being the problem (I falled for that myself: see my comments under the question).

So technically that would be OP's fault, but you can't really blame it on him too much IMO since they're a user only since 14 days.

Speaking of the bounty; this:

Bounty Started worth 50 reputation by GreenGodot

And this:

Bounty Ended with Елин Й.'s answer chosen by Community♦

Mean that OP started a bounty to draw attention to their question and that this happened:

If you do not award the bounty within 24 hours of the bounty period ending, half the bounty value will be automatically awarded to the top voted answer posted after the bounty start, provided it has a score of at least 2.

Fair? Obviously not always, but the problem is that likewise obviously a bot can't deem answers valid itself. Deeming answers valid is up to the voters, and the bot acts in behalf of them.

So, summing up, you can't really blame it on anyone.

OP can't be blamed too much, the answerer can't be blamed, the voters can't be blamed and the Community♦ user can't be blamed.