Skip to main content

Timeline for End of Life for [lts]?

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 4, 2015 at 14:39 answer added Elder Geek timeline score: 2
Nov 3, 2015 at 16:51 answer added Dessa Simpson timeline score: 0
Oct 28, 2015 at 20:36 history tweeted twitter.com/AskUbuntu/status/659468846756188161
Oct 27, 2015 at 21:17 comment added Byte Commander Mod @Tim I did not say that we should keep it. That's just the only use case I could think of. And it could be covered as well with something like "release-upgrade" or however that tag is called.
Oct 27, 2015 at 20:58 comment added Tim @ThomasW. most likely the edit I made just before posting has been reviewed.
Oct 27, 2015 at 20:58 comment added Tim @ByteCommander yes, but is it needed? What value does it add?
Oct 27, 2015 at 18:52 comment added Thomas Ward Mod Note the tag wiki's been updated since this was posted. 11 hours ago from this post.
Oct 27, 2015 at 9:07 comment added Byte Commander Mod It fits for LTS upgrade questions, as the outdated wiki already says.
Oct 27, 2015 at 0:42 comment added terdon @NathanOsman agreed. All I'm saying is that if we were to keep it, the only use would be something like that. Having a "sliding tag" that refers to the current LTS is impossible to maintain.
Oct 27, 2015 at 0:38 comment added Nathan Osman @terdon could there ever be more than one question about the term itself (besides "what is it?")? I don't think we can justify keeping a tag like that for a single question.
Oct 27, 2015 at 0:37 comment added terdon @NathanOsman perhaps to ask about the term itself? As in, "what are LTS releases?". Certainly not in the way the wiki suggests, no.
Oct 27, 2015 at 0:33 comment added Nathan Osman +1 I can't think of a legitimate reason for using this tag that wouldn't be covered by something more specific.
Oct 27, 2015 at 0:20 history asked Tim CC BY-SA 3.0