Search Results

However many posts you flag, improve, vote on, ..., outside review, there will still be plenty more to review. … Not all posts ever appear in review. …

An elegant, technical solution here would be nice. What to Do I have seen this happen, too. When the edit would have been helpful if it had been submitted earlier, I usually work around the problem by …

(In particular, I am not one of the people who designed the review system.) … In review, never be afraid to defer to others when you think you're poorly suited to the particular review item in front of you. But that's what Skip means. …

Before that, users with at least 15 reputation (which includes everyone who can use the review system) can flag questions for closure by clicking the flag link followed by "it doesn't belong here, or it … a post, voting to close it, commenting, editing the post, or any combination of those and some other actions (like voting up or down) are sufficient to enable you to click the I'm Done button in the review …

The Real Solution The solution to bad posts that have no value is for them to be deleted after a sufficient time has passed after they're closed. For posts that clearly have no value at all, that can …

https://askubuntu.com/review/close/210585 seems wrong, but is perhaps understandable. There, the first duplicate close vote came a few hours before the Edit review that dropped it from the queue. … So in the case of that fourth review, it seems: The reviewer used the system as it is meant to be used. The post was out of the review queue... for a few seconds before it went back in. …

Often people who come here and say they need urgent help really are in the right place, because they don't need urgent help. Serious Urgency Suppose someone needs help quickly because: They need to k …

Rather than change the way the system works with practice reviews or review audits, or at least before we do something like that (or in addition to such measures), it might be best simply to ask for more … information to be added to the review banner to explain when "No Action Needed" is and is not appropriate. …

TL;DR: You can't undo your review but, if appropriate, you can still flag the post. … The "Disputed" Status A post that isn't deleted through review doesn't have any special "disputed" status (though there is a record of the review in the post's timeline). …

Users with enough reputation that their edits are not subject to review should still write good edit summaries so it's clear to others why the edit is correct. …

The rejection reason is shown to the user. Invalid edit is the canned rejection reason that applies to edits that attempt to comment on or reply to the post. However, if you can point the misguided …

If I understand you correctly, your hypothesis is that a single individual has cast the sole too broad close vote on each of those six questions. I have good reason to believe that hypothesis is incor …

If you cannot tell how a review item should be handled, or just feel like skipping it, then of course you can always click Skip, but... … A single Edit review drops the item from review. …

What does peer review consist of on Ask Ubuntu? Peer review means someone else must review and approve your edit, before it is applied. … Users with sufficient reputation may visit the review queue for suggested edits (which is one of the categories of review). …

You might be using the review system incorrectly. … selections (where you can pick a comment when voting to delete posts in the Low Quality review) are a form of flagging. They are not. …