Should Users with only 1 reputation be deleted after 30 days without a login? Because It would keep the site cleaner and There must be hundreds - thousands Of dead users that did use their account for only one day, and must of forget their password or something. Now, there are some users who have more than 1 reputation but it is from only 1 answer. Like they have 25, one up vote, and one approve answer, I think these users need to be deleted. This is a kinda bad example, but I didn't need to go hunting for this user also. Abound Is a dead user but he/she isn't registered also. Should I up voted them? Should I accepted their answer? Do you see my problem? I don't want to give them reputation if they are dead, they only have one of them, and should be deleted.
It would keep the site cleaner
I don't see that abandoned accounts really get in the way of anything important. The site is about questions and their answers. If you want to faff around on the
/users/ pages, that's fair enough but that's not the site goal.
Should I up voted them? Should I accepted their answer? Do you see my problem?
You shouldn't be making any voting decisions based on who writes a post. Posts should be voted for on their own merits. User reputation is meaningless when it comes to the content of the post.
If a post answers your question, you should vote for it and accept it. If it doesn't, explain why (other people can see it even if that account has been abandoned) and if poor enough, vote against it.
If you're voting to "give them reputation", you're doing it wrong.
Vote to indicate which posts are best.