Specifically in this case, I am tempted to ask a question regarding any continuing (non-supported by Canonical ) development of Unity (following this), largely with regard to licenses, source code and other efforts which could perhaps make this a more community driven effort.
I would obviously avoid trying to make it a programming question (don't need to ;-) ), but would it be too broad or not accepted in another way?
I suppose it depends on what you're asking really. If @terdon is correct and it's as simple as a non-canonical maintained Unity question, I would consider it on-topic... that's no different than someone saying "How do I install emacs?".
The problem we generally run in to is that the camel nose of bugs or programming questions tends to get under the edge of the tent.
Generally I like the idea, but I do see bug questions getting close vote hammers and people getting upset if it becomes a thing.
