3

This question already has an answer here:

Basically what I am asking is, can I copy and paste an answer I have submitted on another post even when I reference it? Or is it frowned upon? Would you rather a link to the original answer?

marked as duplicate by Eliah Kagan, Braiam, Mitch Aug 17 '14 at 5:17

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • This is frowned upon, especially because if you're copying answers around the questions are probably duplicates. – Seth Aug 14 '14 at 3:27
  • I thought as much. Thank you – Turtle Bum Aug 14 '14 at 3:33
  • How on Earth could this be a duplicate? I mean seriously? This is asking if I can repost an answer. That question states that the answer to the question is another question. – Turtle Bum Aug 14 '14 at 10:19
  • 1
    @TurtleBum when I first read the title of that question, I thought the same thing. But it is actually the same. I read it as "What to do if the good answer is another question?" instead of "What to do if the good answer is in another question?" – Dan Aug 14 '14 at 11:08
  • @TurtleBum To expand on what Dan said, on Ask Ubuntu we use the term "question" in a few different ways. 3 common meanings of "question" here are: [1] a post of question type (as opposed to answer or tag wiki type, a moderator election entry, the tour page, help entries, etc.); [2] a page created by a post of question type that contains that post and may also contain answers (that's, after all, what a link to a question actually points to); or [3] the idea from which a question takes shape (e.g., "If you have a NEW question, ask it by..."). There, it's [2]. – Eliah Kagan Aug 14 '14 at 11:46
5

I think the best thing to do is:

  1. First figure out if you think the questions are duplicates. If you believe so, flag one of them as a duplicate of the other. As Seth says, this is most often the case.

    Typically you will be flagging the question you considered posting an answer on (as the duplicate target should almost always have one or more answers that really do answer the question being closed as a duplicate). This is most often also the more recently posted question.

    When are they duplicates, rather than questions that might share an answer? Unless you expect that other valuable answers would apply to one and not the other, and that neither question can reasonably be broadened to account for this, they are probably duplicates.

    That is a general guideline or heuristic--not a rule. You'll have to use your judgment, or ask others for their input (you can post on meta, or if you have enough rep to talk on chat, you can discuss it there).

  2. If you do not believe they are duplicates, but you do think your answer on the other question--or someone else's--answers it, write an answer that addresses the differences that made the question not duplicates.

    This answer should cite the answer on the other question (whether or not that answer is written by you). Sometimes the best thing to do is restate part of it, and provide a link for more information. Other times, block-quoting from the other answer is the best way. This is for you to decide. You might combine the two.

    Unless the other answer is very short, you should probably not quote the whole thing. (Though there is no copyright problem in doing so provided it's rightly credited--both it and your answer will be licensed under CC-BY-SA 3.0).

    Instead, what you are doing is to adapt the answer to the different question you are answering, in such a way as to address what is different about it, creating a different answer in the process.

  • Is creative commons applicable when you are the owner of the information? – Turtle Bum Aug 14 '14 at 6:28
  • @TurtleBum I am not a lawyer; this isn't legal advice. If you're asking if its restrictions apply to you when you are the author, the answer's generally no. You can copy your own work (provided it really is your own work and that you haven't assigned exclusive rights to another party). The only reason I've brought up CC-BY-SA in this answer is to establish that it is not a copyvio to quote an unlimited amount of text from one SE answer in another, provided proper attribution is given, whether or not the source is your own work (and whether or not it incorporates edits from others). – Eliah Kagan Aug 14 '14 at 6:32
  • Ah I see what you are meaning now. You have confirmed what I thought, thank you :) I would upvote, but I am 1 rep off. – Turtle Bum Aug 14 '14 at 6:36
  • 2
    You still own your answers so you can repost without attribution (provided the post is wholly your work). Technically this wasn't the case pre-2014 but I spent some time ensuring the old wording was replaced. – Oli Aug 14 '14 at 7:11
  • @Oli Btw, thank you very, very much for your service in this regard. The old ToS wording about this was severely problematic, and in my opinion the change has greatly benefited SE users and the public. – Eliah Kagan Aug 14 '14 at 7:33
  • @TurtleBum there has been cases of people literally copying themself or part of their answers in different answers. – Braiam Aug 15 '14 at 12:36

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .