For the comments we have lots of links, such as [se]
and [ubuntu.se]
.
Here is a list of requested redirects, from me and the comments:
[launchpad]
goes to https://launchpad.net/ubuntu
and shows as Launchpad
[launchpad#bugnum]
goes to https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/bugnum
and shows as Bug #bugnum
[forums]
goes to http://ubuntuforums.org/
and sows as Ubuntu Forums
[discourse]
goes to http://discourse.ubuntu.com
and shows as Ubuntu Discourse
[paste]
or [pastebinit]
goes to http://paste.ubuntu.com
and shows as Ubuntu Pastebin
[install-d]
goes to http://ubuntu.com/download/desktop/install-ubuntu-desktop
and shows as Install Ubuntu Desktop
[install-s]
goes to http://ubuntu.com/download/server/install-ubuntu-server
and shows as Install Ubuntu Server
ppa:peterlevi/ppa
goes to https://launchpad.net/~peterlevi
and shows as ppa:peterlevi/ppa
[ubuntu.se] and [se] and [so]
ppa:peterlevi/ppa
and make it link tohttps://launchpad.net/~peterlevi
?http://pad.lv/ppa/skellat/tests
gives the same expanded output asppa:skellat/tests
.[download]
,[install]
and[paste]
are a bit of an overkill. How much do those get used comments for that exact meaning? And what would happen if someone wrote something like the following:[download](http://some.link/to/download/some/application/)
or if that gets taken care of, missing something in the markup like:[download]http://some.link/to/download/some/application/)
would make the download point to Ubuntu which makes it worse. My point is that those are too generic and can mean a lot of things to be used as quick links.