Instead of having to remember the whole apt.ubuntu.com/p/package
shebang, it would be easier to just support apt://package
links.
2 Answers
apt.ubuntu.com currently doesn't have the nicest UI in the world, but https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AptUrlRedirector suggests more how it should work. I hope I'll get some time to actually implement nicer screens on apt.ubuntu.com to make it more worthwhile to link to.
-
3
-
1Improvements to the AptUrlRedirector can be found on the LanchPad Page– Marco Ceppi ModCommented Dec 11, 2010 at 21:31
It is my understanding that apt:// protocol links are deprecated. These provide a terrible experience on non-Ubuntu platforms, with no further explanation of what Ubuntu is and how they can get the software they just clicked the aforementioned link for.
Granted, apt.ubuntu.com currently suffers this problem as well, but it is my hope that its authors will use the free advertising space it provides to start a conversation with non-Ubuntu users.
-
3apt:// bot working on non-Ununtu systems shouldn't be an issue as this Ask Ubuntu is targeted for Ubuntu users. Commented Feb 3, 2011 at 2:24
-
1But it is important to make all links uniform, for simplicity, be it on Ask Ubuntu or Loco Teams' wikis, etc.– AgmenorCommented Feb 16, 2011 at 15:41
?packagename
and having that translate server side to the apt.ubuntu.com ...?[text](package)
.)