Timeline for How much can an answer be modified before it should be its own entity?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 25, 2021 at 0:16 | vote | accept | matigo | ||
Sep 24, 2021 at 18:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/AskUbuntu/status/1441462455541006343 | ||
Sep 20, 2021 at 13:09 | history | edited | Thomas WardMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edit in the queue was rejected as "attempt to reply". So, update "is" to "was"
|
Sep 20, 2021 at 11:57 | answer | added | Nate T | timeline score: 2 | |
Sep 20, 2021 at 11:02 | comment | added | Nate T | Also, since we cannot close a answer, are severely down-voted answers ok to change? There is more but Ive already done more than intended. Maybe I'll ask a question later, if I get time. | |
Sep 20, 2021 at 11:02 | comment | added | Nate T |
I've been wondering the same but for a question. When I edit anything, I try to be very careful not to deviate from what the author intended to communicate (as I understand it.) However, The SE wikis (from what I've noticed,this is more or less the same from site to site,) editors of closed questions are encouraged to take it to the cutting room and fill the floor with tape. I came across it again yesterday in the Vim & Vi help section, and was wondering exactly how broad the scope is for this, among other things. E.G. does it only apply to closed Qs, or any Q that doesn't work without it?
|
|
Sep 20, 2021 at 10:41 | history | became hot meta post | |||
Sep 20, 2021 at 9:36 | answer | added | terdon | timeline score: 7 | |
Sep 20, 2021 at 8:22 | answer | added | BeastOfCaerbannog | timeline score: 4 | |
Sep 20, 2021 at 7:12 | history | asked | matigo | CC BY-SA 4.0 |