Skip to main content
16 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 12, 2020 at 14:35 history edited CommunityBot
Commonmark migration
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:25 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://askubuntu.com/ with https://askubuntu.com/
Jan 11, 2016 at 19:39 history edited Thomas WardMod CC BY-SA 3.0
Lets use a better title here, one that is a little more professional.
Jan 11, 2016 at 19:33 vote accept nicael
Jan 11, 2016 at 19:33
Jan 11, 2016 at 19:29 answer added Thomas WardMod timeline score: 4
Jan 11, 2016 at 19:13 comment added nicael @Thomas You can obviously disagree; it can be just me.
Jan 11, 2016 at 19:12 comment added Thomas Ward Mod I don't see anything wrong with ours' size; it is proportional to everything else perfectly and there is no issue with it being "too big" or "too small"; everything works fine and fits fine even on small screens... so why is this an issue?
Jan 11, 2016 at 18:02 comment added nicael @Mateo the voting buttons are too small then.
Jan 10, 2016 at 23:49 comment added Mateo your example in comments - the check mark is the exact same size as ours pixel for pixel: i.sstatic.net/TeDEs.png
Jan 10, 2016 at 21:12 comment added nicael @Serg Android has a pretty small one, worth reporting too. Though most of the sites have the voting buttons and the checkmark sized equally.
Jan 10, 2016 at 21:09 history edited nicael CC BY-SA 3.0
added 11 characters in body
Jan 10, 2016 at 21:07 comment added Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy I'm no moderator, but each site has their own designs for small details like that . I've just jumped from this to this and then to this. So your point that it's not in line with Stack Exchange family doesn't make sense. All of those sites have different design for check-mark button
Jan 10, 2016 at 21:03 history edited nicael CC BY-SA 3.0
added 25 characters in body
Jan 10, 2016 at 21:03 comment added nicael @Serg It's not inline with other sites of Stack Exchange family. Take this answer on Meta Stack Exchange as an example of the normal-sized checkmark.
Jan 10, 2016 at 21:01 comment added Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy Well . . .why is it bad ? People can see that it's the accepted answer easily, and besides consider people with limited vision
Jan 10, 2016 at 20:57 history asked nicael CC BY-SA 3.0