Timeline for Should we have 14.10 tag?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:25 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://askubuntu.com/ with https://askubuntu.com/
|
|
| Aug 23, 2014 at 18:49 | comment | added | Rinzwind | your 2nd comment to me is a reaon why tagging a question with a release number is not always smart. An error in 13.10 that is not related to it being EOL can help a 12.04 or 14.04 user. On the other side: it is soooooooo darn handy to sort the questions on a tag like 13.10 (or Mint) and close-vote the new created ones :D | |
| Aug 23, 2014 at 10:27 | history | edited | Tim | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 43 characters in body
|
| Aug 23, 2014 at 1:21 | history | edited | Braiam |
edited tags
|
|
| Aug 23, 2014 at 1:21 | answer | added | Braiam | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 20, 2014 at 20:55 | comment | added | RobotHumans | @Oli - fair enough, if you look at my posts on meta about beta release options, i'm on the "if you can answer it, then go for it" team. i just don't think there needs to be a taxonomy for "i hope you know what you're doing" objects | |
| Aug 20, 2014 at 20:32 | comment | added | Oli Mod | 14.10 isn't wholly of topic anyway, even now. We seem to bump into that myth every six months. | |
| Aug 20, 2014 at 19:48 | comment | added | RobotHumans | it's policy to close them previous to that, so there's no need to retag. they should be closed and asked again later when they're on topic if the uestion persists. | |
| Aug 20, 2014 at 19:43 | comment | added | Nickolai Leschov | @hbdgaf I'm afraid it would be a chore to re-tag all the relevant questions at the moment of official release. Is that policy written up somewhere? | |
| Aug 20, 2014 at 19:41 | comment | added | RobotHumans | later when it's on topic | |
| Aug 20, 2014 at 19:38 | history | asked | Nickolai Leschov | CC BY-SA 3.0 |