Yesterday I reviewed about ten posts, of which three where tests. Today in just three reviews I got a test. I find this an overkill, especially since I passed all the tests so far. Not very motivating wasting time like this.

I would suggest tests to be conducted permanently, but on a lower volume, say three per week.

  • 1
    Well, I got one test in ~200 reviews. Maybe the algorithm is using some other data (say, reviewer discordance) to decided how many tests a reviewer needs?
    – landroni
    Commented Feb 26, 2014 at 10:05
  • 2
    What is "reviewer discordance"? Commented Feb 26, 2014 at 10:06
  • An awkward way to say that you have two differing reviewer decisions on the same post: say, one upvotes it while the other downvotes. Or one performs a heavy edit while the other indicates that no action is needed. But I'm only speculating here.
    – landroni
    Commented Feb 26, 2014 at 10:08
  • See meta.askubuntu.com/a/8552/44179 audits are random, so it should calm down. It did for me.
    – Seth
    Commented Feb 26, 2014 at 16:02
  • @Wilf Nope, mods still get review audits, I got one today actually ;)
    – Seth
    Commented Feb 26, 2014 at 17:23
  • @Seth Half of mine yesterday seemed to be tests - though the ones today were better :D
    – Wilf
    Commented Feb 26, 2014 at 17:24
  • Hmm. I've only gotten three tests over dozens of reviews.
    – belacqua
    Commented Feb 26, 2014 at 20:35
  • @Seth Nice to see the ♦ next to your name.
    – don.joey
    Commented Feb 27, 2014 at 10:30
  • I have never run into a test yet, is there a rep cap or number completed required to begin to get audited, or is it for certain review queue's only? Commented Feb 27, 2014 at 14:43


You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .