Have noticed in chat and meta all users are being encouraged to vote more.
Does this mean peoples attitude to voting might need adjusted?
Am trying to list some related questions and observations regarding the use of voting.
Does any answer to a question that fully answers the question deserve an upvote even if it is an unexperienced users answer being viewed by an experienced user?
One question that has been marked as duplicate in main Question marked as duplicate
has answer which asker confirms as accepted by confirming in comments (they have not found the accepted answer button and do not have enough rep to vote up).
The same answer was used to edit the other question that is linked. canonical question which actually did not provide an answer when originally marked as duped so i edited an answer there as mentioned. There are at least six names associated with this process yet the answer to Question marked as duplicate has not been voted on up or down.
Should reviewers vote on questions and answers they as they review questions?
Is there any reason to be concerned about this?
Another point i would like to make is some people appear to be rep hoing (prtostituting themselves with purely the intention of gaining rep) by giving very menial answers to questions that actualy have answers already elsewhere on site nor are they editing existing answers to other similar questions to enable the marking of dupe.
Is there something far wrong with current voting system and being abused by some?