To be extremely precise in what I'm targetting this to, so you know I'm not against all the canned responses:
I agree with the first and third canned responses. I have a problem with the use of the second canned response.
I fully, 100% disagree with the use of the second canned response. This canned response is cold, and not helpful to flaggers at all to understand why their flags are declined.
While there are those moderators here on Ask Ubuntu who will use the "Other...." reason to actually describe the reasoning (and kudos to those mods for taking the time to do this), other mods just blindly use the "no evidence" cananed response without explaining the reasoning.
I'm tired of seeing this in my flags feedback, because then I have to hunt down the moderator and ask for the description of why. Can we just have mods extremely limit the use of that canned response and have the moderator give a better description of why the flag is declined by using the "other" option to put a description?