-6

Speaking from experience, waiting for a suggested edit to be approved (before 2000 rep.) can be tiring and annoying. So what I want to know is if you guys think the following is a good idea. For those of us (me) who are avid editors, after ~100-150 approved edits, we get a privilege on the site that allows us to immediately publish edits that we make. This is just an idea, and I'd love your feedback or suggestions for improvements on this

3
  • What's with all the downvotes? The question/suggestion was made in good faith. Such downvotes intimidate other people from suggesting things here.
    – rclocher3
    Commented Dec 2, 2016 at 17:45
  • @rclocher3 Voting is different on meta. Commented Sep 6, 2017 at 17:19
  • @EliahKagan Aha, makes sense now, thanks for pointing that out.
    – rclocher3
    Commented Sep 7, 2017 at 0:55

1 Answer 1

19

Features like this are put behind an experience wall because we want experience.
Both technical with the subject matter, and with the system.

150 good edits is equivalent a weekend of contact time for some people. That's not nearly enough time to get everything right, or more importantly, for the system to notice a problem (in appropriate edits, etc).

We don't want new users in a position where they can cause lots damage without oversight.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .