Many problems on this website create the appearance that something is missing from Ubuntu and that a remedy might involve sudo apt install
. Unfortunately many posted solutions do not have references. For example is the following.
askubuntu has a web page for the following problem.
Gtk-Message: Failed to load module "canberra-gtk-module"
The answer with the most up-votes has 389 up-votes. askubuntu.com link
The solution with the most up-votes does not seek to install using the same string that is cited in the error message. In other words the answer is not sudo apt install canberra-gtk-module
. The solution with the most up-votes is somewhat similar to that but not exactly. Since it is not exactly that, ideally the correct answer or the most up-voted answer should have a reference to a canonical source.
How can I independently verify via referencing canonical sources that the most up-voted answer is the correct answer?
apt
while others preferapt-get
. Welcome to the maze of linux uniformity. As time progressed, and gtk3 became prevalent,canberra-gtk3-module
became available, whereascanberra-gtk-module
is gtk2.apt-get
is not the only difference.apt-get
toapt
was introduced in Ubuntu 16.04. itsfoss.com/apt-vs-apt-get-differenceapt-get
is still useful for the vast majority of users so I always useapt
now.apt-get
when I started with Ubuntu, and apt was added later. There was no shift, asapt-get
is still as useful as before, so why change.apt
and I also useapt
so the difference does not arise from the installation program. This question is about the package names.