Timeline for Activate migration paths to Unix and Linux, should we?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
21 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2020 at 13:07 | history | edited | terdon | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 502 characters in body
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:25 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://askubuntu.com/ with https://askubuntu.com/
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jul 7, 2016 at 11:07 | comment | added | terdon Mod | @Dan no, it was discarded. If you find posts that would be a good fit for U&L, just flag them for mod attention and suggest migration. | |
| Jul 7, 2016 at 11:06 | comment | added | Dan | Did we end up trying that trial run? or was this discarded? | |
| Jul 6, 2016 at 22:12 | history | edited | terdonMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| Sep 8, 2014 at 17:24 | comment | added | Braiam | @AnnaLear :(... | |
| May 5, 2014 at 15:12 | vote | accept | Braiam | ||
| Jul 6, 2016 at 23:38 | |||||
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:47 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 8:50 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| Mar 14, 2014 at 23:38 | vote | accept | Braiam | ||
| Mar 15, 2014 at 0:12 | |||||
| Mar 7, 2014 at 19:43 | comment | added | terdon | @Seth indeed :). I think if we coordinate things well enough between the two sites, it might work. A closer relationship between the two main *nix SE sites would be a good idea in general. It would be nice if the regulars of both sites knew enough to pass questions around correctly. And thanks for stepping in above, I know what he was getting at, I was objecting to the way he chose to get at it. Don't worry, I'm sure he's just having a bad day and is not usually quite as abrasive as that :). | |
| Mar 7, 2014 at 19:39 | comment | added | Seth Mod | I like the idea of trying it for a month. A week wouldn't give us enough time to teach those users who don't understand the tool the correct way to do this, but a month should be enough. Might also liven things up a bit ;P | |
| Mar 7, 2014 at 18:58 | comment | added | slm | Developing this migration relationship is likely going to take effort from both communities but IMO these Q's are a untapped source for U&L and are an added burden to AU. Both communities could benefit from this. We already share a fair amount of users (I see several AU users w/ fair amounts of rep on U&L) as you should recognize many of the U&L users frequenting AU. This seems like a logical step to me, assuming we get enough ppl buying into the idea! | |
| Mar 7, 2014 at 18:46 | comment | added | slm | As the #2 rep'd user on U&L I'd like to weigh in here and would welcome this, esp. if we could do it on a trial basis. I think a week is too short, perhaps 1 month? At any rate we have a lot of ppl that could participate more if we had more questions flowing in, we're by no means overworked and have excess bandwidth to deal with this. | |
| Mar 7, 2014 at 18:40 | comment | added | Adam Lear StaffMod | @derobert It's about 5 seconds of work. | |
| Mar 7, 2014 at 18:02 | history | edited | terdon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 233 characters in body
|
| Mar 7, 2014 at 17:53 | comment | added | derobert | (speaking as another Unix.SE user) I'm not sure how hard it is to enable/disable a migration path, but if its not too much work, the obvious approach would seem to be turn it on for a week, and then ask on Meta.UnixSE if it should stay enabled or not. | |
| Mar 7, 2014 at 15:58 | history | edited | terdon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 13 characters in body
|
| Mar 7, 2014 at 15:18 | comment | added | Braiam | Not migrating crap is the golder rule of migrations anyways ;). Now, I know I have slapped around communities for migrating questions to other sites they are not active/aware of their rules, but I feel that the non-crap questions that deserves answers is easier and cleaner to migrate them rather than asking OP to re/crosspost it rather than face deletion due being OT in the site asked. Heck, I know I could get slapped in UL by this proposal, but I do it thinking in what's the best for both communities. | |
| Mar 7, 2014 at 15:01 | history | answered | terdon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |