Return to Answer

Several of the edits that you suggested were rejected which lead to your account temporary barred from suggesting any more edits. This suspension would last for a week and is automatic.

See Why is the edit button disabled?.

Just going through some of your recent suggested edits:

• Edit 205528 - Too minor. The title could have been improved.
• Edit 205526 - Stripped info from title.
• Edit 205525 - Very minor change which categorically ignored every other issue with the post.
• Edit 205529 - The description read 'improved formatting' but the edit clearly had nothing to do with formatting. It only tampered the title.

I am looking at a plethora of suggested edits that don't seem to greatly improve the value of the post, which doesn't bode well with our policy.

Just for your quick reference, here's a relevant quote from the help center about editing:

Edits are expected to be substantial and to leave the post better than you found it. Common reasons for edits include:

• To fix grammar and spelling mistakes
• To clarify the meaning of the post (without changing that meaning)
• To include additional information only found in comments, so all of the information relevant to the post is contained in one place
• To correct minor mistakes or add updates as the post ages
• To add related resources or hyperlinks

Several of the edits that you suggested were rejected which lead to your account temporary barred from suggesting any more edits. This suspension would last for a week and is automatic.

See Why is the edit button disabled?.

Just going through some of your recent suggested edits:

• Edit 205528 - Too minor. The title could have been improved.
• Edit 205526 - Stripped info from title.
• Edit 205525 - Very minor change which categorically ignored every other issue with the post.
• Edit 205529 - The description read 'improved formatting' but the edit clearly had nothing to do with formatting. It only tampered the title.

I am looking at a plethora of suggested edits that don't seem to greatly improve the value of the post, which doesn't bode well with our policy.

Just for your quick reference, here's a relevant quote from the help center about editing:

Edits are expected to be substantial and to leave the post better than you found it. Common reasons for edits include:

• To fix grammar and spelling mistakes
• To clarify the meaning of the post (without changing that meaning)
• To include additional information only found in comments, so all of the information relevant to the post is contained in one place
• To correct minor mistakes or add updates as the post ages
• To add related resources or hyperlinks

Several of the edits that you suggested were rejected which lead to your account temporary barred from suggesting any more edits. This suspension would last for a week and is automatic.

See Why is the edit button disabled?.

Just going through some of your recent suggested edits:

• Edit 205528 - Too minor. The title could have been improved.
• Edit 205526 - Stripped info from title.
• Edit 205525 - Very minor change which categorically ignored every other issue with the post.
• Edit 205529 - The description read 'improved formatting' but the edit clearly had nothing to do with formatting. It only tampered the title.

I am looking at a plethora of suggested edits that don't seem to greatly improve the value of the post, which doesn't bode well with our policy.

Just for your quick reference, here's a relevant quote from the help center about editing:

Edits are expected to be substantial and to leave the post better than you found it. Common reasons for edits include:

• To fix grammar and spelling mistakes
• To clarify the meaning of the post (without changing that meaning)
• To include additional information only found in comments, so all of the information relevant to the post is contained in one place
• To correct minor mistakes or add updates as the post ages
• To add related resources or hyperlinks

Several of the edits that you suggested were rejected which lead to your account temporary barred from suggesting any more edits. This suspension would last for a week and is automatic.

See Why is the edit button disabled?.

Just going through some of your recent suggested edits:

• Edit 205528 - Too minor. The title could have been improved.
• Edit 205526 - Stripped info from title.
• Edit 205525 - Very minor change which categorically ignored every other issue with the post.
• Edit 205529 - The description read 'improved formatting' but the edit clearly had nothing to do with formatting. It only tampered the title.

I am looking at a plethora of suggested edits that don't seem to greatly improve the value of the post, which doesn't bode well with our policy.

Just for your quick reference, here's a relevant quote from the help center about editing:

Edits are expected to be substantial and to leave the post better than you found it. Common reasons for edits include:

• To fix grammar and spelling mistakes
• To clarify the meaning of the post (without changing that meaning)
• To include additional information only found in comments, so all of the information relevant to the post is contained in one place
• To correct minor mistakes or add updates as the post ages
• To add related resources or hyperlinks

Several of the edits that you suggested were rejected which lead to your account temporary barred from suggesting any more edits. This suspension would last for a week and is automatic.  

See Why is the edit button disabled?.

Just going through some of your recent suggested edits:

• Edit 205528 - Too minor. The title could have been improved.
• Edit 205526 - Stripped info from title.
• Edit 205525 - Very minor change which categorically ignored every other issue with the post.
• Edit 205529 - The description read 'improved formatting' but the edit clearly had nothing to do with formatting. It only tampered the title.

I am looking at a plethora of suggested edits that don't seem to greatly improve the value of the post, which doesn't bode well with our policy.

Just for your quick reference, here's a relevant quote from the help center about editing:

 

Edits are expected to be substantial and to leave the post better than  you found it. Common reasons for edits include:

 

 
• To fix grammar and spelling mistakes
 
• To clarify the meaning of the post (without changing that meaning)
 
• To include additional information only found in comments, so all of the information relevant to the post is contained in one place
 
• To correct minor mistakes or add updates as the post ages
 
• To add related resources or hyperlinks
 

Several of the edits that you suggested were rejected which lead to your account temporary barred from suggesting any more edits. This suspension would last for a week and is automatic.

See Why is the edit button disabled?.

Just going through some of your recent suggested edits:

• Edit 205528 - Too minor. The title could have been improved.
• Edit 205526 - Stripped info from title.
• Edit 205525 - Very minor change which categorically ignored every other issue with the post.
• Edit 205529 - The description read 'improved formatting' but the edit clearly had nothing to do with formatting. It only tampered the title.

I am looking at a plethora of suggested edits that don't seem to greatly improve the value of the post, which doesn't bode well with our policy.

Just for your quick reference, here's a relevant quote from the help center about editing:

 

Edits are expected to be substantial and to leave the post better than  you found it. Common reasons for edits include:

 

 
• To fix grammar and spelling mistakes
 
• To clarify the meaning of the post (without changing that meaning)
 
• To include additional information only found in comments, so all of the information relevant to the post is contained in one place
 
• To correct minor mistakes or add updates as the post ages
 
• To add related resources or hyperlinks