Several of the edits that you suggested were rejected which lead to your account temporary barred from suggesting any more edits. This suspension would last for a week and is automatic. 

See https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/81681/why-is-the-edit-button-disabled.


----------


Just going through some of your recent suggested edits:

- [Edit 205528](https://askubuntu.com/review/suggested-edits/205528) - Too minor. The title could have been improved.
- [Edit 205526](https://askubuntu.com/review/suggested-edits/205526) - Stripped info from title.
- [Edit 205525](https://askubuntu.com/review/suggested-edits/205525) - **Very** minor change which categorically ignored every other issue with the post.
- [Edit 205529](https://askubuntu.com/review/suggested-edits/205529) - The description read 'improved formatting' but the edit clearly had nothing to do with formatting. It only tampered the title.

I am looking at a plethora of suggested edits that don't seem to greatly improve the value of the post, which doesn't bode well with our policy.


Just for your quick reference, here's a relevant quote from the [help center about editing][1]:

> Edits are expected to be substantial and to leave the post better than
> you found it. Common reasons for edits include:
> 
>    - To fix grammar and spelling mistakes
>    - To clarify the meaning of the post (without changing that meaning)
>    - To include additional information only found in comments, so all of the information relevant to the post is contained in one place
>    - To correct minor mistakes or add updates as the post ages
>    - To add related resources or hyperlinks


  [1]: https://askubuntu.com/help/editing