<p>Several of the edits that you suggested were rejected which lead to your account temporary barred from suggesting any more edits. This suspension would last for a week and is automatic. </p>

<p>See <a href="http://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/81681/why-is-the-edit-button-disabled">Why is the edit button disabled?</a>.</p>

<hr>

<p>Just going through some of your recent suggested edits:</p>

<ul>
<li><a href="http://askubuntu.com/review/suggested-edits/205528">Edit 205528</a> - Too minor. The title could have been improved.</li>
<li><a href="http://askubuntu.com/review/suggested-edits/205526">Edit 205526</a> - Stripped info from title.</li>
<li><a href="http://askubuntu.com/review/suggested-edits/205525">Edit 205525</a> - <strong>Very</strong> minor change which categorically ignored every other issue with the post.</li>
<li><a href="http://askubuntu.com/review/suggested-edits/205529">Edit 205529</a> - The description read 'improved formatting' but the edit clearly had nothing to do with formatting. It only tampered the title.</li>
</ul>

<p>I am looking at a plethora of suggested edits that don't seem to greatly improve the value of the post, which doesn't bode well with our policy.</p>

<p>Just for your quick reference, here's a relevant quote from the <a href="http://askubuntu.com/help/editing">help center about editing</a>:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Edits are expected to be substantial and to leave the post better than
  you found it. Common reasons for edits include:</p>
  
  <ul>
  <li>To fix grammar and spelling mistakes</li>
  <li>To clarify the meaning of the post (without changing that meaning)</li>
  <li>To include additional information only found in comments, so all of the information relevant to the post is contained in one place</li>
  <li>To correct minor mistakes or add updates as the post ages</li>
  <li>To add related resources or hyperlinks</li>
  </ul>
</blockquote>