Skip to main content
15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 6, 2014 at 12:07 comment added Aditya @Braiam: I obviously know that :-) ... I didn't get inbox notification for the comment made by vasa1 on Dec 24 at 11:34 AM (he did ping me on that one)... The pinging problem has been solved by now - must be a temporary bug...
Jan 6, 2014 at 0:56 comment added Braiam @Aditya if you aren't the post owner, obviously you will not get messages unless pinged with the @
Jan 6, 2014 at 0:55 comment added Braiam @KevinBowen if you see my answer below, and here you will notice that I was talking about that if we are asked to explain our DV, I could raise also a Meta post about upvotes...
Dec 24, 2013 at 20:02 comment added Aditya @vasa1: I get what you are talking about... Anyways, I don't know why am I not getting inbox notifications for comments on Meta... Anyone else facing this?
Dec 24, 2013 at 12:58 comment added user25656 I don't want to argue with people who have contributed so much to Ask Ubuntu.
Dec 24, 2013 at 12:40 comment added Marco Ceppi Mod @vasa1 That's why I put quotes around anonymous, it makes it a dubious statement. While no one can see you upvotes, the system knows and does routine pattern behavior checks for various forms of cheating, rage voting, and sockpuppeting
Dec 24, 2013 at 11:34 comment added user25656 @Aditya, it was in the context of the number of downvotes I cast and it was not from a Community Manager or a developer.
Dec 24, 2013 at 11:24 comment added Aditya @vasa1: You must have got the email from one of the Community Managers.. Stack Exchange reverses votes if something seems to be abnormal.. So, voting is not completely anonymous - the developers and community managers can view and analyze anything and everything related to SE (which is obvious)... However, our votes are just visible to them - even the moderators of the site cannot view who/when did the user cast his/her votes.
Dec 24, 2013 at 3:38 comment added user25656 "Voting, both up and down, is a completely "anonymous" function of the site." I got an e-mail asking me to explain my voting pattern :)
Dec 24, 2013 at 2:18 comment added Kevin Bowen @Braiam No. I don't think that I am. Obviously the community sees value in your contributions and appreciates them. However, I, personally, think that you are being a bit more dramatic than the issue calls for. We have a great group of folks who keep each other honest. It is not perfect, but again, I, personally, think that it works and you are acting like the sky is falling. I wish that I could spend more time here now, but an 80 hour a week job takes precedence. Keep up the good work, but realize we are a fluid bunch. ;-)
Dec 24, 2013 at 2:08 comment added Braiam @KevinBowen you are mistaking my words. Marco is taking my question as a rant, when that was not my intention. I'm doing a reversal about some other question which was worrying about a couple of downvotes in a question (which was wrote almost 45 minutes after the question was posted) and I am pointing out something that should be more worrying instead.
Dec 24, 2013 at 2:05 comment added Kevin Bowen @Braiam Because you are just ranting for the sake of ranting and telling others how to behave?
Dec 24, 2013 at 1:34 comment added Braiam Wait, are you telling me that I can't rant? Then why I post in meta if I can't rant??? I was so sure that rants were the blood and soul of meta.
Dec 24, 2013 at 0:43 comment added RobotHumans Related bits from chat chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/201/conversation/related-bits I agree on votes are anonymous and generally sort themselves out though. Upvote.
Dec 24, 2013 at 0:37 history answered Marco CeppiMod CC BY-SA 3.0