Timeline for This is what we should be worring about, we are upvoting CRAP in Ask Ubuntu!
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 6, 2014 at 12:07 | comment | added | Aditya | @Braiam: I obviously know that :-) ... I didn't get inbox notification for the comment made by vasa1 on Dec 24 at 11:34 AM (he did ping me on that one)... The pinging problem has been solved by now - must be a temporary bug... | |
Jan 6, 2014 at 0:56 | comment | added | Braiam | @Aditya if you aren't the post owner, obviously you will not get messages unless pinged with the @ | |
Jan 6, 2014 at 0:55 | comment | added | Braiam | @KevinBowen if you see my answer below, and here you will notice that I was talking about that if we are asked to explain our DV, I could raise also a Meta post about upvotes... | |
Dec 24, 2013 at 20:02 | comment | added | Aditya | @vasa1: I get what you are talking about... Anyways, I don't know why am I not getting inbox notifications for comments on Meta... Anyone else facing this? | |
Dec 24, 2013 at 12:58 | comment | added | user25656 | I don't want to argue with people who have contributed so much to Ask Ubuntu. | |
Dec 24, 2013 at 12:40 | comment | added | Marco Ceppi Mod | @vasa1 That's why I put quotes around anonymous, it makes it a dubious statement. While no one can see you upvotes, the system knows and does routine pattern behavior checks for various forms of cheating, rage voting, and sockpuppeting | |
Dec 24, 2013 at 11:34 | comment | added | user25656 | @Aditya, it was in the context of the number of downvotes I cast and it was not from a Community Manager or a developer. | |
Dec 24, 2013 at 11:24 | comment | added | Aditya | @vasa1: You must have got the email from one of the Community Managers.. Stack Exchange reverses votes if something seems to be abnormal.. So, voting is not completely anonymous - the developers and community managers can view and analyze anything and everything related to SE (which is obvious)... However, our votes are just visible to them - even the moderators of the site cannot view who/when did the user cast his/her votes. | |
Dec 24, 2013 at 3:38 | comment | added | user25656 | "Voting, both up and down, is a completely "anonymous" function of the site." I got an e-mail asking me to explain my voting pattern :) | |
Dec 24, 2013 at 2:18 | comment | added | Kevin Bowen | @Braiam No. I don't think that I am. Obviously the community sees value in your contributions and appreciates them. However, I, personally, think that you are being a bit more dramatic than the issue calls for. We have a great group of folks who keep each other honest. It is not perfect, but again, I, personally, think that it works and you are acting like the sky is falling. I wish that I could spend more time here now, but an 80 hour a week job takes precedence. Keep up the good work, but realize we are a fluid bunch. ;-) | |
Dec 24, 2013 at 2:08 | comment | added | Braiam | @KevinBowen you are mistaking my words. Marco is taking my question as a rant, when that was not my intention. I'm doing a reversal about some other question which was worrying about a couple of downvotes in a question (which was wrote almost 45 minutes after the question was posted) and I am pointing out something that should be more worrying instead. | |
Dec 24, 2013 at 2:05 | comment | added | Kevin Bowen | @Braiam Because you are just ranting for the sake of ranting and telling others how to behave? | |
Dec 24, 2013 at 1:34 | comment | added | Braiam | Wait, are you telling me that I can't rant? Then why I post in meta if I can't rant??? I was so sure that rants were the blood and soul of meta. | |
Dec 24, 2013 at 0:43 | comment | added | RobotHumans | Related bits from chat chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/201/conversation/related-bits I agree on votes are anonymous and generally sort themselves out though. Upvote. | |
Dec 24, 2013 at 0:37 | history | answered | Marco CeppiMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |