Timeline for Should posts be edited to have readable links?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2013 at 20:54 | answer | added | Nanne | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 11, 2013 at 17:33 | comment | added | Eliah Kagan | Related (but not a duplicate): A call to uphold accessibility by not shortening links to “here” | |
| Jan 27, 2013 at 16:23 | comment | added | Nanne |
Apart from all the answers, I thing a special case should be made for URL's that are themselves interesting. For instance, if I have a manual I link to, sure, but if I say "I get redirected to http://www.example.com if I do this", the actual URL itself is important and should be remained readable.
|
|
| Jan 24, 2013 at 9:56 | history | edited | Eliah Kagan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
presumably the author does not intend to exclude tag wikis from the scope of this discussion; added editing tag
|
| Jan 24, 2013 at 9:33 | vote | accept | Lewis Goddard | ||
| Jan 24, 2013 at 6:21 | answer | added | Eliah Kagan | timeline score: 9 | |
| Jan 24, 2013 at 2:16 | answer | added | Mateo | timeline score: 11 | |
| Jan 24, 2013 at 0:38 | answer | added | Seth | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 24, 2013 at 0:20 | answer | added | RobotHumans | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jan 24, 2013 at 0:08 | history | asked | Lewis Goddard | CC BY-SA 3.0 |