Timeline for Do we need a new "ubuntu-for-phones" tag?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
17 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 17, 2017 at 10:13 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.askubuntu.com/ with https://meta.askubuntu.com/
|
|
Mar 17, 2017 at 10:13 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.askubuntu.com/ with https://meta.askubuntu.com/
|
|
Jan 4, 2013 at 12:39 | history | edited | gertvdijk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
moved long version of the mobile ambiguous opinion to another question, removed now useless footnote, upgraded Flimms comment a supportive argument from a footnote, added "may discourage people in reviewing" as per comment of david6
|
Jan 4, 2013 at 8:50 | history | edited | gertvdijk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
cleaned up answer, major rewrite for easier readability; Post Made Community Wiki
|
Jan 3, 2013 at 22:26 | history | edited | gertvdijk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
removed reference to Flimm on second response (not very valid after all)
|
Jan 3, 2013 at 22:06 | history | edited | gertvdijk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added possible differences to mobile version
|
Jan 3, 2013 at 22:00 | history | edited | gertvdijk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added possible differences to mobile version
|
Jan 3, 2013 at 21:44 | comment | added | david6 | I strongly agree that these are two distinct subjects. By @Jorge's argument, anything about smartphone or tablet is indistinguishable from the root issue: How to modify/improve Ubuntu to work on mobile devices. IMHO 'mobile' is about (all of) portable (smartphone, tablet), low-CPU power, touch interface, RAM limitations, ARM (or similar) processors, etc. Whereas, 'Ubuntu-for-phones' is a boutique offering (like for Nexus-7), that is purely a smartphone play (and product demonstration). | |
Jan 3, 2013 at 20:06 | history | edited | gertvdijk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 21 characters in body
|
Jan 3, 2013 at 19:58 | history | edited | gertvdijk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added NART, preventing from keeping site clean, developers on launchpad
|
Jan 3, 2013 at 19:04 | history | edited | gertvdijk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
minor update: split sentence, added note as to avoid confusion
|
Jan 3, 2013 at 18:23 | history | edited | gertvdijk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added about teams own advantage to have a separate tag for this.
|
Jan 3, 2013 at 18:10 | comment | added | gertvdijk | @MarcoCeppi I'm not stating it isn't. On the contrary, I think it's too ambiguous, as it covers too many different things. | |
Jan 3, 2013 at 17:56 | comment | added | Marco Ceppi Mod | How does mobile not cover the efforts of the phone? | |
Jan 3, 2013 at 16:14 | history | edited | gertvdijk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 42 characters in body
|
Jan 3, 2013 at 16:02 | history | edited | gertvdijk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 190 characters in body
|
Jan 3, 2013 at 15:56 | history | answered | gertvdijk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |