Timeline for Other users can edit my questions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:25 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://askubuntu.com/ with https://askubuntu.com/
|
|
| Jan 4, 2013 at 1:06 | history | edited | Mateo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
clarified 1 rep requirment, so as not to suggest using reputation for an edit.
|
| Jan 3, 2013 at 21:29 | comment | added | nanofarad | @EliahKagan Oh, I see now. I was reading it incorrectly. | |
| Jan 3, 2013 at 20:11 | comment | added | Eliah Kagan | @ObsessiveSSOℲ Suggesting an edit doesn't use up any reputation. Just as 15 rep is required to upvote but upvoting doesn't cost any rep, we say 1 reputation is required to suggest edits. Since all users (even unregistered users, whose edit suggestions are submitted anonymously) have at least 1 reputation, this is just a way of saying that anyone who can use the site can suggest edits. | |
| Jan 3, 2013 at 12:23 | comment | added | nanofarad | I've never seen the behavior of investing one rep to suggest an edit. Is this new? Or long-gone? | |
| Jan 3, 2013 at 11:50 | comment | added | jrg Mod | @Flimm I meant the original poster by "you" - the writer doesn't have a choice, their content is (by the license that they submitted it under) editable. | |
| Jan 3, 2013 at 11:16 | comment | added | Flimm | I do not think StackExchange is obliged to provide wiki functionality just because the content is licensed under CC-BY-SA. CC-BY-SA means people can copy and modify the content keeping the same license, but it doesn't mean anyone is obliged to allow users to modify content hosted on their servers. | |
| Jan 3, 2013 at 11:13 | history | edited | Flimm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Users with 2000 rep can review suggested edits
|
| Jan 3, 2013 at 10:25 | history | answered | jrgMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |