Timeline for Can we have an integrated filter to detect AI generated content?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3 at 16:05 | vote | accept | Archisman Panigrahi | ||
| May 27 at 14:36 | answer | added | sotirov | timeline score: 4 | |
| May 27 at 13:42 | comment | added | Archisman Panigrahi | @sotirov This is a good idea. Please propose this as an answer. | |
| May 27 at 9:56 | history | became hot meta post | |||
| May 26 at 15:45 | comment | added | sotirov |
The Complete Rate-Limiting Guide @terdon shared mentions: Users with < 125 rep must wait 3 minutes between answers on most Stack Exchange sites, but must wait 30 minutes between answers on Stack Overflow. Why don't we do this for AskUbuntu too, changing the wait time from 3 to 30 minutes?
|
|
| May 25 at 22:01 | answer | added | Thomas WardMod | timeline score: 6 | |
| May 25 at 13:58 | comment | added | Archisman Panigrahi | My proposal is, if there are more than one such posts within a short time, with high AI probability, we ask the OP to stop and post after 24 hours, or something like that. | |
| May 25 at 13:51 | comment | added | VLAZ | @ArchismanPanigrahi should we take that your example with a single true positive and a single true negative does indeed trump users testing a wide variety of posts with AI detectors and finding them to still produce false positives and false negatives to a sufficient degree? | |
| May 25 at 13:43 | comment | added | Archisman Panigrahi | I copy pasted some answers by that user to quillbot.com/ai-content-detector, and it showed 100% likely AI generated. I copy pasted my answers, and it showed 0% likely AI generated. | |
| May 25 at 13:40 | comment | added | terdon | AI detectors don't really work though. That's a big part of the problem. If we could reliably detect AI-written posts automatically, none of this would be an issue :/ | |
| May 25 at 13:39 | comment | added | Archisman Panigrahi | @terdon The AI detector will filter them when there are more than one answers likely generated by AI. If someone posts many human-written-answers, that is fine. | |
| May 25 at 12:52 | comment | added | terdon | "However, if there are many such consecutive answers, they will be definitely AI generated": How do you distinguish between this and a user who writes answers in an external editor before copy/pasting onto the site? And note that answers are rate limited, see the "Answering" section here: The Complete Rate-Limiting Guide | |
| May 25 at 2:11 | comment | added | stumblebee | AFAIK, No bot has yet been created to detect this. In the interim, Is there a Query that can be composed to detect too many answers given within a short period of time? Hopefully someone with much more expertise than me can answer this. | |
| May 24 at 15:42 | history | asked | Archisman Panigrahi | CC BY-SA 4.0 |