Timeline for Under what specific conditions should a question be flagged as "very low quality"? [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2020 at 14:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Aug 31, 2017 at 15:13 | history | closed |
ZannaMod Kevin Bowen karel Fabby guntbert |
Duplicate of How do I flag correctly? | |
| Aug 27, 2017 at 20:52 | comment | added | Zanna Mod | This post has an incorrect answer afaik | |
| Aug 26, 2017 at 17:46 | review | Close votes | |||
| Aug 31, 2017 at 15:13 | |||||
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:25 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://askubuntu.com/ with https://askubuntu.com/
|
|
| Nov 3, 2011 at 11:55 | vote | accept | Knowledge Cube | ||
| Nov 1, 2011 at 23:11 | answer | added | Knowledge Cube | timeline score: 2 | |
| Oct 28, 2011 at 1:21 | comment | added | Knowledge Cube | @belacqua I agree. The flag seems to cover just situations where either an edit or flagging as offtopic would do just as well. I'm just wondering if there are any special situations that would call for it. | |
| Oct 28, 2011 at 0:33 | comment | added | belacqua | Having recently gotten the same message from the mods, I've had the same question. I'm sure there is a lot of subjectivity here, and I assume our overworked mods are not going to spend forever on these judgments, but I'm of the opinion that it's not a very useful flag as currently constituted. | |
| Oct 27, 2011 at 20:18 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackUbuntu/status/129653222200717313 | ||
| Oct 26, 2011 at 18:50 | history | asked | Knowledge Cube | CC BY-SA 3.0 |