Timeline for Is it wrong to comment in a "high quality post" in a review test (audit)?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2020 at 15:24 | comment | added | KGIII | I didn't realize they even had a failed audit test. To date, I've never failed one. I didn't even realize they had a failed audit system/blurb. Anyhow, my question to myself would be, "Does it really need a comment?" If the answer is no, then I would just move on. | |
| Sep 16, 2020 at 13:14 | history | edited | ZannaMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Sep 7, 2020 at 9:38 | history | became hot meta post | |||
| Sep 7, 2020 at 9:13 | answer | added | ZannaMod | timeline score: 10 | |
| Sep 7, 2020 at 8:26 | comment | added | Kulfy | Strongly related: Clicking “Add comment” fails review audit on Meta Stack Exchange. | |
| Sep 7, 2020 at 8:19 | history | edited | Random Person | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added link to the audit task
|
| Sep 7, 2020 at 8:13 | history | asked | Random Person | CC BY-SA 4.0 |