Timeline for Malicious/Dead link removal Policy, Process, Product requested
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2018 at 23:26 | comment | added | Fabby | I tried on Linux.stackexchange.com and there was only one there, so not posting on meta.se Thanks again! | |
| Jun 6, 2018 at 23:25 | vote | accept | Fabby | ||
| May 31, 2018 at 9:22 | comment | added | Fabby | I saw someone started at the top, so I started at the bottom... | |
| May 31, 2018 at 9:21 | history | rollback | Fabby |
Rollback to Revision 4
|
|
| May 31, 2018 at 9:19 | history | edited | Fabby | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Updated Answer
|
| May 31, 2018 at 8:32 | comment | added | Oli Mod | The pornhub edit approval above was particularly annoying. | |
| May 31, 2018 at 8:30 | comment | added | Oli Mod | @Fabby I upgraded the script yesterday to not use regexes and used fixed strings (I manually expanded and converted the list from Smokey). This flies along (hence the output above). I'll get it uploaded as soon as I get a chance. | |
| May 30, 2018 at 23:41 | comment | added | Fabby | Moderately powerful desktop??? On my Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-7700HQ CPU @ 2.80GHz, I get 60-64 it/s... | |
| May 30, 2018 at 22:59 | history | edited | Fabby | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Updated Answer
|
| May 30, 2018 at 22:31 | comment | added | a spaghetto | Worth noting also that almost all of the authors of these posts have too much reputation to be detected. (50 rep is the maximum for the blacklist) | |
| May 30, 2018 at 22:16 | comment | added | ArtOfCode | "As far as I know it doesn't retroactively search when a new "bad link" is added." - the logic behind this is that if the post containing $BadDomain doesn't get bumped, then it's not really going to be a problem. If it does get bumped, it'll get scanned again and picked up. | |
| May 30, 2018 at 21:04 | history | edited | OliMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 3846 characters in body
|
| May 30, 2018 at 18:21 | comment | added | Fabby | Cool! I'll check it out when I get back to my Ubuntu machine... Upvoted already! | |
| May 30, 2018 at 17:20 | comment | added | Thomas Ward Mod | This would be outside the scope of Smoke Detector, we'd have to have a dedicated utility that would do this. SmokeDetector has no mechanisms to retroactively test posts, and if it did we'd have no API queries left. (It takes exponentially more requests to do retroactive testing, and I doubt SE would give the Charcoal team an API key with greater than 20000 requests a day anyways, which is what we have now) | |
| May 30, 2018 at 13:24 | history | edited | OliMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 859 characters in body
|
| May 30, 2018 at 11:02 | history | answered | OliMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |