Timeline for What happened to "blatantly off-topic"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 23, 2017 at 19:41 | history | edited | Eliah Kagan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
changed "adding" to "using" since this seems specifically about what to select on the closure menu, but please roll back or otherwise re-edit if this is not what you mean
|
Oct 23, 2017 at 19:35 | history | edited | pomsky | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 86 characters in body
|
Oct 23, 2017 at 19:28 | history | edited | Eliah Kagan |
edited tags
|
|
Oct 23, 2017 at 19:21 | answer | added | Eliah Kagan | timeline score: 3 | |
Oct 23, 2017 at 17:21 | answer | added | Robert Cartaino | timeline score: 5 | |
Oct 23, 2017 at 15:21 | comment | added | Thomas Ward Mod | in recent days, I'd say that its tone would be a little bit harsh and toeing the line there, but as the close reason is no more, it's less of an issue in my opinion. | |
Oct 23, 2017 at 15:20 | comment | added | pomsky | @ThomasWard I actually used the custom option and wrote "blatantly off-topic" in case of the aforementioned question. I was slightly worried whether it's now considered against the "be nice" policy and we should stop using it. | |
Oct 23, 2017 at 15:14 | comment | added | Thomas Ward Mod | With the varying changes over time and migration of systems, we changed the close reasons. We also altered the close reasons to be the most commonly used close reasons used. If it's blatantly offtopic though then you can use the "This is not about Ubuntu" close reason, or use a custom one you write out yourself, because that's the closest thing you can get. | |
Oct 23, 2017 at 15:01 | history | asked | pomsky | CC BY-SA 3.0 |