Timeline for Is there a way to remove a "wrong" duplicate flag from a question? [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2020 at 14:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Jul 1, 2018 at 21:03 | history | closed |
pomsky CommunityBot |
Duplicate of Question marked as duplicate how to contact the people to explain why it is not? | |
| Oct 9, 2017 at 20:39 | history | edited | pomsky | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Oct 9, 2017 at 20:34 | comment | added | pomsky | @MarkKirby Thanks! I've removed them. | |
| Oct 9, 2017 at 20:33 | history | edited | pomsky | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1164 characters in body
|
| Oct 9, 2017 at 19:56 | comment | added | Mark Kirby | No need to keep updating your question to explain yourself, we understand and this is exactly what Meta is for, disscusion of the main site. Your disclaimer and update are not needed. | |
| Oct 9, 2017 at 17:38 | history | edited | pomsky | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 196 characters in body
|
| Oct 9, 2017 at 17:11 | history | edited | pomsky | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 352 characters in body
|
| Oct 9, 2017 at 16:09 | history | edited | pomsky | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Oct 9, 2017 at 15:57 | history | edited | pomsky | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Oct 9, 2017 at 15:47 | history | edited | pomsky | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 157 characters in body
|
| Oct 9, 2017 at 15:39 | history | edited | pomsky | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 632 characters in body
|
| Oct 9, 2017 at 15:33 | history | edited | Thomas WardMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 58 characters in body
|
| Oct 9, 2017 at 15:31 | comment | added | Eliah Kagan | @pomsky Thanks. Btw, as one of the close voters there, I will say that not only does linking the question not offend me, but the exact opposite: If a closure is correct, you give people an opportunity to defend it. If a closure is wrong (as this one looks to be--I'll likely vote to reopen soon), you protect us from causing further harm and also give us the opportunity to cast reopen votes. Of course, it is also possible for someone to wrongly change their mind about a good close vote or defend a bad one, but the point remains that you are only giving us opportunities, not taking them away. | |
| Oct 9, 2017 at 15:18 | comment | added | Thomas Ward Mod | @pomsky probably a temporary issue with imgur... | |
| Oct 9, 2017 at 15:00 | history | edited | pomsky | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Oct 9, 2017 at 14:54 | history | edited | pomsky | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1163 characters in body
|
| Oct 9, 2017 at 14:15 | history | asked | pomsky | CC BY-SA 3.0 |