Timeline for Messages to close voters in questions: are they OK?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2017 at 16:23 | comment | added | Elder Geek | Thanks for the chuckle! I needed that. I`d be interested to see a discussion on what would be considered for the carrot and how to accomplish the bigger and better stick, that could be converted to a feature request. :-) | |
| Apr 12, 2017 at 16:17 | comment | added | Kaz Wolfe | @ElderGeek I'd say a carrot, and a bigger stick. Preferably carbon-fiber and up to Thomas Ward's design specs. | |
| Apr 12, 2017 at 13:48 | comment | added | Elder Geek | You make an excellent point regarding the robo-review problem. This has been discussed in several variations across the Stack Exchange network. Example 1 Example2 The Review Audit system is (I think) designed to keep reviewers mindful of what they are doing. So the stick already exists, are you suggesting a carrot? :-) | |
| Apr 9, 2017 at 18:23 | history | edited | Kaz Wolfe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 374 characters in body
|
| Apr 5, 2017 at 17:47 | comment | added | Elder Geek | I would agree that it shouldn't typically be in the post itself. I think dropping a comment indicating what you are doing is fine however. | |
| Apr 5, 2017 at 17:45 | history | edited | Kaz Wolfe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 81 characters in body
|
| Apr 5, 2017 at 17:36 | history | answered | Kaz Wolfe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |