Timeline for Are computer brand tags necessary?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2016 at 18:27 | vote | accept | Kaz Wolfe | ||
| Aug 30, 2016 at 12:32 | answer | added | Léo Léopold Hertz 준영 | timeline score: 0 | |
| Aug 29, 2016 at 22:19 | comment | added | Thomas Ward Mod | My opinion is that these tags are important if the issue is hardware-specific. Wifi issues, among others, tend to be hardware-specific if the network otherwise works on other computers, in which case the hardware/brand distinction is important. | |
| Aug 29, 2016 at 21:24 | history | edited | TheWanderer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Aug 29, 2016 at 21:19 | history | edited | Kaz Wolfe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 9 characters in body
|
| Aug 29, 2016 at 21:17 | answer | added | Mark Kirby | timeline score: 4 | |
| Aug 29, 2016 at 21:17 | comment | added | TheWanderer |
You also might want to specify what you mean by brand tag. For instance, nvidia, amd, intel, wacom, etc are all brand tags that are pretty important.
|
|
| Aug 29, 2016 at 21:16 | comment | added | TheWanderer | While we're at it, let's just get rid of tags :p. | |
| Aug 29, 2016 at 21:11 | answer | added | Kaz Wolfe | timeline score: -3 | |
| Aug 29, 2016 at 21:08 | history | asked | Kaz Wolfe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |