Today , I was editing a question and apparently there were some new changes in place for spam detection. Definitely good news . . . except that spam detection is broken:
Out of all the words that there are for spam, the system latched onto "According" and "Wikipedia". IMHO it is overboard and puts sticks into wheels of users who are trying to write well-researched answers with sources. Please revise the spam filter, as this is . . . how should I put it . . .doesn't do what it's supposed to do.
On a side note, I propose a rep-cap feature added to spam filter. Users like myself - with over 10k of reputation are probably- can be sufficiently trusted , so such filtering for high-rep users is pointless.