Timeline for I'm really not very pleased with the audit system
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
17 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:25 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://askubuntu.com/ with https://askubuntu.com/
|
|
| Jun 6, 2016 at 11:13 | comment | added | You'reAGitForNotUsingGit | @edwinksl - <sigh> | |
| Jun 6, 2016 at 4:16 | comment | added | edwinksl | Looks like I also fell for this tricky review audit. :/ | |
| Jun 4, 2016 at 12:44 | comment | added | Jonas Czech | You can see your review history here: askubuntu.com/users/current/?tab=activity&sort=reviews - "It was plainly obvious it was an audit" that's because they are only designed to make sure you're actually paying attention. (It doesn't actually show you that the "Community" user added the "bunch of random stuff" until after you pass the audit BTW, though.) | |
| Jun 4, 2016 at 12:08 | comment | added | You'reAGitForNotUsingGit | @MarkKirby - Yeah, the "community" user added a bunch of random stuff in an edit. It was plainly obvious it was an audit. | |
| Jun 4, 2016 at 12:06 | comment | added | Mark Kirby | I know, audits are supposed to trick you. Edit ones will add random words in amongst the text and others will show an answer was voted down when it is actually +10 and accepted, it is to trick you and make you pay attention, if in doubt open the original question. | |
| Jun 4, 2016 at 12:04 | comment | added | You'reAGitForNotUsingGit | @MarkKirby - Muru's comment wasn't visible when I reviewed. | |
| Jun 4, 2016 at 12:03 | comment | added | Mark Kirby |
It is right, you can see Muru flagged it from his comment, it was the same as another answer. Not sure about the spam reason myself, should perhaps be removed for length and content. You just got a tricky one. Skip when in doubt, you only had the privilege for a day, when you get more experience, they mostly stick out like a sore thumb, mostly...
|
|
| Jun 4, 2016 at 11:57 | comment | added | You'reAGitForNotUsingGit | @Dan - Hyperlink added. | |
| Jun 4, 2016 at 11:56 | history | edited | You'reAGitForNotUsingGit | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 65 characters in body
|
| Jun 4, 2016 at 11:54 | comment | added | Mark Kirby | Quickest way, look in your browser history, don't think there is an audit history in profile. | |
| Jun 4, 2016 at 11:53 | comment | added | You'reAGitForNotUsingGit | @MarkKirby - <Sigh> this is a stupid question, but how do I view my reviewing history so I can find the failed audit? | |
| Jun 4, 2016 at 11:52 | comment | added | Mark Kirby | Also, if in doubt, press skip. | |
| Jun 4, 2016 at 11:50 | comment | added | You'reAGitForNotUsingGit | @MarkKirby - Thanks for the tip! I did suspect it, because the system identified it as possible spam. | |
| Jun 4, 2016 at 11:48 | comment | added | Mark Kirby | FYI The best way to deal with audits, if you suspect one, is visit the original question and see what is going on, there only purpose is to make sure you are paying attention but sometimes they can go badly wrong meta.askubuntu.com/questions/15451/… | |
| Jun 4, 2016 at 11:43 | comment | added | Dan | Nothing automated in life can be perfect (At least not yet), it can only get better by reporting those imperfections when found so they get fixed. Can you add a link to the audit so we can help a bit more? | |
| Jun 4, 2016 at 11:31 | history | asked | You'reAGitForNotUsingGit | CC BY-SA 3.0 |