Timeline for How can bash question is on-topic and C programming off-topic?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 16, 2017 at 15:45 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.unix.stackexchange.com/ with https://unix.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Nov 17, 2015 at 10:58 | vote | accept | Alex Jones | ||
Nov 15, 2015 at 8:59 | history | edited | Alex Jones | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 134 characters in body
|
Nov 15, 2015 at 8:29 | comment | added | Rinzwind | There was a question below it indicating I was showing something that was a -possible- argument. | |
Nov 15, 2015 at 8:27 | answer | added | Alex Jones | timeline score: -2 | |
Nov 15, 2015 at 8:27 | comment | added | Alex Jones | @Rinzwind you should quote next time >:-) serious or not serious | |
Nov 14, 2015 at 21:37 | comment | added | Rinzwind | and before you start quoting chat messages make damn sure I am serious... and make sure you tell the WHOLE story. | |
Nov 14, 2015 at 21:35 | comment | added | Rinzwind | so you conveniently leave 1/2 of it out? AU is an official support medium for Ubuntu and U&L is not. That alone makes your point invald. Please check the usage graph: if AU was part of U&L 99% of U&L would be about Ubuntu: gigaom.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/1/2015/01/… The same goes for U&L and SU @muru. | |
Nov 14, 2015 at 16:51 | comment | added | Alex Jones | @muru that is what I am saying -_- | |
Nov 14, 2015 at 14:10 | comment | added | muru | There is no need for U&L, since we have Super User. That argument is pointless | |
Nov 14, 2015 at 12:55 | vote | accept | Alex Jones | ||
Nov 15, 2015 at 7:58 | |||||
Nov 14, 2015 at 12:40 | answer | added | kos | timeline score: 5 | |
Nov 14, 2015 at 12:24 | history | edited | Alex Jones | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 17 characters in body
|
Nov 14, 2015 at 12:23 | answer | added | RobotHumans | timeline score: 2 | |
Nov 14, 2015 at 12:18 | history | asked | Alex Jones | CC BY-SA 3.0 |