Timeline for How to see all deleted questions of a particular user?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
20 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:25 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://askubuntu.com/ with https://askubuntu.com/
|
|
| Oct 31, 2015 at 20:11 | comment | added | Jacob Vlijm | Haha, honestly, I didn't notice (and I don't keep track on votes too closely here :) ). | |
| Oct 31, 2015 at 19:58 | comment | added | Fabby | @JacobVlijm: Yeah, seen it already and upvoted already! No need to beg for more upvotes! :P ;-) | |
| Oct 31, 2015 at 19:48 | comment | added | Jacob Vlijm | Related: meta.askubuntu.com/questions/13752/… | |
| Oct 31, 2015 at 18:55 | vote | accept | Fabby | ||
| Oct 31, 2015 at 18:39 | answer | added | SethMod | timeline score: 3 | |
| Oct 31, 2015 at 17:26 | comment | added | RolandiXor Mod | Once this behaviour reaches a certain level, the system kicks in and moderators are notified. | |
| Oct 31, 2015 at 0:06 | comment | added | Thomas Ward Mod | Thought so, I think it's an anti abuse system too | |
| Oct 30, 2015 at 23:12 | comment | added | Fabby | @ThomasW. Yup... and this user is in this exact situation according to Seth. | |
| Oct 30, 2015 at 19:43 | comment | added | Nathan Osman | @ThomasW. I think you're right - some sort of anti-ragequit system. | |
| Oct 30, 2015 at 17:14 | comment | added | Thomas Ward Mod | Correct me if I'm wrong, but if they delete enough of their posts won't they get locked out from posting? I seem to remember that if you delete your own stuff too much you get locked out for a while. | |
| Oct 30, 2015 at 13:34 | history | rollback | Fabby |
Rollback to Revision 4
|
|
| Oct 30, 2015 at 12:43 | comment | added | kos | @Pilot6 Neither do I, but the user needs to understand that's (generally) against the rules. It wasn't a big deal in these cases, but we don't know if it did that in other cases (unlikely since they are a member since today, but still), and in general doing that with questions potentially useful with an answer in the comments or on the question is harmful, and it's against the rules. | |
| Oct 30, 2015 at 12:39 | history | edited | Tim | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 19 characters in body
|
| Oct 30, 2015 at 12:24 | history | edited | kos | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Oct 30, 2015 at 12:21 | history | edited | Tim | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 20 characters in body
|
| Oct 30, 2015 at 12:17 | history | edited | Fabby | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Incorporated comments into question
|
| Oct 30, 2015 at 12:16 | comment | added | Fabby | That's why "ab" was in between "()" and I use the word "seems"... Until further investigation, we don't know if he's actually gaming the system or not... (edited for clarity anyway. thanks for the comment @Pilot6) | |
| Oct 30, 2015 at 12:13 | comment | added | Pilot6 | I do not see any problems with that user. He asked two questions, got some comments that solved his issue and deleted the questions. It is not an abuse. | |
| Oct 30, 2015 at 12:09 | history | asked | Fabby | CC BY-SA 3.0 |