Timeline for Why not moderate questions from new users before making them visible on site?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2015 at 4:07 | history | edited | Eliah Kagan |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 11, 2015 at 14:35 | answer | added | Fabby | timeline score: 4 | |
| Apr 11, 2015 at 14:14 | comment | added | Panther | With > 500 rep you can help with these things - askubuntu.com/help/privileges/access-review-queues | |
| Apr 11, 2015 at 14:13 | comment | added | Panther | It would only add one more thing to review. As it is now, spam is flagged and managed rapidly. New users are moderated / moderated in several ways already in ways you can access depending on your reputation see askubuntu.com/help/privileges. In addition, IMO it is unwelcoming when as a new user you can not post questions. The overwhelming majority of new users are legitimate and so I subscribe to "if it not broken don't fix it". | |
| Apr 11, 2015 at 13:42 | comment | added | muru | I'm pretty sure one of Atwood or Spolsky specifically mentioned this as something they wouldn't do in Stack Exchange. Can't find the post now. And it doesn't happen at Stack Overflow, so it's doubtful it will fallen here. | |
| Apr 11, 2015 at 13:40 | comment | added | muru | Related: meta.stackexchange.com/q/185530/270345 | |
| Apr 11, 2015 at 13:25 | history | asked | Faizan Akram Dar | CC BY-SA 3.0 |