Timeline for My question was deleted. Was this on random or following a policy?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2015 at 12:11 | history | edited | muru | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
typos
|
| Jan 19, 2015 at 2:18 | comment | added | Seth Mod | Here is a link to the question. My guess was that you got a few close votes back when the question wasn't so clear and then those kinda "carried it through" the queue. Happens sometimes I'm afraid. Instead of asking a new question it would have been better if you had just edited your original question to include the new information and perhaps offered a bounty to get it more eyes. We don't really need two questions for the same topic. | |
| Jan 19, 2015 at 0:56 | vote | accept | r4. | ||
| Jan 18, 2015 at 23:38 | answer | added | terdon | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 18, 2015 at 23:10 | comment | added | Thomas Ward Mod | Well, if the question is exactly the same, and the only difference is architecture, then marking as "duplicate" and "on hold" was right - after several months I believe it's OK to be deleted. If the answer on your other question is "not working on 32bit" then you need to comment as such on the answer and ask for clarification. | |
| Jan 18, 2015 at 23:06 | history | asked | r4. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |