Timeline for Users under 500 rep need to leave a comment as to why they downvoted?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Sep 16, 2016 at 5:53 | vote | accept | Kaz Wolfe | ||
| Oct 10, 2014 at 9:14 | comment | added | Thufir | I don't think downvoting per se is the problem, there has to be a stick to go with the carrot. Some questions could be so horrible that any comment would be a waste of time. I do think there's a problem with some people trying to bring in others to get certain questions downvoted. I've been on the receiving end, eventually a moderator had to step in, delete and repost the question! I'm inferring that's the sort of behaviour the question is really about..? Downvoting is essential, but can be abused. | |
| Oct 3, 2014 at 14:06 | comment | added | Thomas Ward Mod | @Whaaaaaat you've missed the point of this post then. | |
| Oct 2, 2014 at 3:24 | comment | added | Kaz Wolfe | Also, not a comment. It's a private screen that's visible the OP (and maybe the mods). No usernames or anything. | |
| Oct 2, 2014 at 3:23 | comment | added | Kaz Wolfe | Fourth paragraph deals with the anonymity issue. You can easily add point 3 as an option. Not the first? Do a counter like CVs do. | |
| S Oct 2, 2014 at 2:47 | history | answered | Thomas WardMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 | |
| S Oct 2, 2014 at 2:47 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Thomas WardMod |