@JacobVlijm I am not following you. When I raised flag I clearly stated in the comment that the answer is copy/paste of André Borie's answer. If the comment was taken in account the system could figure out why I raised the flag. The only assumption in this story is that a reviewer will understand that user_1234536 is actually André Borie. Could I noticed that there is no answer from user_1234536? Perhaps I could but I didn't. I trusted that the system will not trick me.

I don't feel comfortable discussing the problem with you any more. It does not feel as a constructive conversation. Thank you for your feedback. I will take it into consideration.

No doubt that there is a great value in audits. My point is let's make audits more intelligent.

I got your point. However, the system should be more intelligent since in the comment I stated that flag was raised because the answer is copy/paste of André Borie answer. :)

The answer to be reviewed was not posted by André Borie but by anonymous user. Therefore my review was correct since it is not acceptable to copy internal answers, right?

This is the question. The complete answer by André Borie was supposed to be reviewed.