Zanna, do you mean posts from Meta Stack Exchange or Ask Ubuntu Meta?

@Catija On the basis of what criteria does SE decide regarding how many positions will be open in an election?

Catija, may I know if any one of the inactive mods are stepping down?

Kinda related post: meta.askubuntu.com/q/19447

cocomac, I am not sure if EoL is the appropriate term in your post. EoSS might be the appropriate term. Please check this: meta.askubuntu.com/q/19658.

Hey @gparyani ! Welcome to AU meta. I would like to thank you for bringing up this topic. Changing the off-topic policy in AU is quite a sensitive thing IMO (according to personal experience). Everyone has their opinion regarding this and this causes (or has already caused) conflicts. I suggest you to go through these links: meta.askubuntu.com/q/19510, meta.askubuntu.com/q/19616, chat.stackexchange.com/search?q=EoL&room=201, meta.askubuntu.com/q/19689, etc. Feel free to ping me in Island of castaway thoughts chatroom to talk to me about the policy issues.

@Dan I am late. Sorry. The post which you shared isn't really a discussion about changing the policy. It was a post about seeking clarification regarding the policy after it came into effect. This is the only post which I could kinda think of as discussion regarding the policy change: meta.askubuntu.com/q/19510.

Thanks for the answer Zanna!

@Paul I have already posted about it MSE. Also, other users too have done it.

@matigo There have been other cases too... like this: meta.stackexchange.com/q/333089

Is the status-planned tag appropriate now? I don't think so.

I suggest you to post this as an answer here: meta.stackexchange.com/q/372049

This has been fixed.

@cocomac Did you use full site or mobile view? I was using full site.

@BeastOfCaerbannog All the review queues are empty now. But, I can confirm that edit UI in non-review queue pages looks like what someone is seeing i.sstatic.net/JFMch.png. So, perhaps this is a bug which needs to be reported in MSE.