Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with suggested-edits
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 44179
Used on questions concerning suggestions on edits or edits to be peer-reviewed.
5
votes
Accepted
reviewers of reviewers need to be mindful as well
I'm not surprised your edit was rejected, because you didn't explain where you got the output from.
By looking at it, how do we know whose output that is? I've seen a good many edits by people with …
- 58.9k
21
votes
Accepted
Offensive comment as Post edit: A way to escape with Untracked crime
As to what you should choose. Vandalism would be the correct choice here, per it's description:
This edit introduces spam, defaces the post in some way, or is otherwise inappropriate.
You c …
- 58.9k
15
votes
Accepted
How to tell an editor they are doing something consistently wrong?
This is where the @ replies come in handy.
Users become eligible for an @ reply on a post if they do one of the following things:
Vote to close the post.
Edit the post.
Comment on the post. …
- 58.9k
4
votes
Accepted
How to suggest an editing only changing one character?
How can I edit only one character?
Short answer: You don't.
Long answer: The 6 character requirement has a purpose. Every edit a sub 2k user makes has to be reviewed by at least two normal u …
- 58.9k
4
votes
Accepted
Edit rejected as conflicted with a subsequent edit
Yes, it is counted as a rejected edit. A few rejects are okay, they happen.
- 58.9k
3
votes
Accepted
Rejecting edits because they "Failed to correct critical issues with the post"
They changed the reject reasons recently, the thinking being if it fails to correct critical issues the reviewer will fix them with the "accept and edit" or "reject and edit" buttons.
More on that o …
- 58.9k