Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with review-audits
Search options not deleted
user 367990
3
votes
Accepted
Failed audit - unclear really?
The Community user randomly puts tests into the review queues. This is to check whether the reviewers pay attention and do their work right. A single mistake has no consequences, but many of them may …
- 109k
7
votes
Review queue audit: what to do with obvious spam?
You could click the link to view the question on the main site to examine the post more thoroughly.
If it is really a spam post that hasn't been deleted yet, flag it as such. Or if it is not spam bu …
- 109k
11
votes
Accepted
Disagree with audit
Audits are generated automatically by the system, there is no manual human verification of them involved, as far as I know. It just takes any post it deems as good, based on the metrics it knows (vote …
- 109k
2
votes
1
answer
107
views
Spam answer as Low-Quality-review test?
I just had to review this test in the LQ queue, which was a spam answer.
However, my thought was that spam should never had appeared in the LQ queue and therefore I was a bit confused about this. I r …
- 109k
5
votes
Some new weird review ban
According to https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/158678/280883
Here are the full details on how the ban works. Most of the steps take into account the length of any previous review bans you've faced, …
- 109k