Timeline for Is asking about reverting phone to Android on-topic?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:18 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://android.stackexchange.com/ with https://android.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| May 16, 2014 at 14:26 | history | edited | LiveWireBT | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| May 16, 2014 at 14:14 | comment | added | terdon | Ah much better, thanks, have a +1. | |
| May 16, 2014 at 14:13 | comment | added | LiveWireBT | @terdon That was probably superfluous. I removed that part, is it clearer now what I mean? From my experience, moving monolithic things around instead of spending a little effort into breaking them up into individual components is even better for the OP, because he gets quicker feedback (and probably part of the solution) instead of different people wasting his time by throwing it around (happens sometimes in professional support teams), because they don't understand the whole thing. We know Ubuntu, we (part of us) support Ubuntu phone, we link to the rest (that is about custom ROMs). | |
| May 16, 2014 at 13:58 | history | edited | LiveWireBT | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 14 characters in body
|
| May 16, 2014 at 13:56 | comment | added | terdon | I just don't understand what corporate irresponsibility is in this context (it sounds kinda like a rant) and you seem to be implying that questions should be answered even if they are off topic. If that's not what you're saying, please edit and clarify. "Moving a question around" is often the right thing to do. | |
| May 16, 2014 at 13:54 | comment | added | LiveWireBT | @terdon I'm suggesting to differentiate between supported and unsupported devices and have answers for those two cases. One links and cites instructions on the wiki (I'm sure we already have that), the other links to an appropriate answer that deals with custom ROMs (because that's what these are and if you can flash one you can flash to others too). All the others are duplicates of the former two. So at best these are two crisp answers that we should already have, just need to find and review them. Link to the rest. That couldn't possibly be so much effort, like you make it sound. | |
| May 16, 2014 at 13:17 | comment | added | terdon | "Instead of moving questions around like acting with corporate irresponsibility, one should answer the question." : are you suggesting we should answer questions even if they're off topic? | |
| May 16, 2014 at 6:40 | history | edited | LiveWireBT | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 244 characters in body
|
| May 16, 2014 at 6:26 | history | answered | LiveWireBT | CC BY-SA 3.0 |