Timeline for reviewers of reviewers need to be mindful as well
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:25 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://askubuntu.com/ with https://askubuntu.com/
|
|
| Apr 17, 2014 at 21:02 | comment | added | Jacob Vlijm | @guntbert That makes it indeed a bit more nuanced than how I looked at it yesterday. Even many first posts / late answers (my area so far :)) make a different impression if they are separated from their own setting. | |
| Apr 17, 2014 at 20:42 | comment | added | guntbert | There is something that I didn't know until I started reviewing edits myself: reviewers see only the post and the suggested edit, they don't see the comments that you incorporated. | |
| Apr 17, 2014 at 12:57 | vote | accept | Jacob Vlijm | ||
| Apr 17, 2014 at 7:53 | answer | added | Dan | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 17, 2014 at 5:08 | history | edited | Jacob Vlijm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 15 characters in body
|
| Apr 17, 2014 at 0:24 | comment | added | Braiam | @JorgeCastro that was in a question, at could be perfectly the cause of OP problems. I wouldn't "fix it". | |
| Apr 16, 2014 at 23:00 | answer | added | SethMod | timeline score: 5 | |
| Apr 16, 2014 at 22:49 | comment | added | Seth Mod | @JorgeCastro Good what? That doesn't appear to be a good edit to me. | |
| Apr 16, 2014 at 22:18 | comment | added | Jorge Castro | In general I think people are rejecting minor edits for no reason. Here's a good one: askubuntu.com/review/suggested-edits/248373 | |
| Apr 16, 2014 at 21:50 | comment | added | Braiam | Why I'm not surprised | |
| Apr 16, 2014 at 21:49 | history | edited | Braiam |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 16, 2014 at 21:49 | history | edited | Jacob Vlijm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Apr 16, 2014 at 21:40 | history | asked | Jacob Vlijm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |